Open Access
| Numéro |
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 191, 2024
9e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Numéro d'article | 12005 | |
| Nombre de pages | 14 | |
| Section | Sémantique | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202419112005 | |
| Publié en ligne | 28 juin 2024 | |
- Anscombre, J.-C. (1975). Il était une fois une princesse aussi belle que bonne. Semantikos, 1, 1, 1–28. [Google Scholar]
- Anscombre, J.-C. (1976). Il était une fois une princesse aussi belle que bonne II. Semantikos, 1, 2, 1–26. [Google Scholar]
- Anscombre, J.-C. (1995). Topique or not topique: formes topiques intrinsèques et formes topiques extrinsèques. Journal of Pragmatics, 24, 115–141. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Anscombre, J.-C. (2009). La comédie de la polyphonie et ses personnages. Langue Française, 164, 4, 11–31. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Anscombre, J.-C. & Ducrot, O. (1977). Deux mais en français? Lingua, 43, 23–40. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Anscombre, J. C. et Ducrot, O. (1983). L’argumentation dans la langue. Bruxelles: Mardaga. [Google Scholar]
- Asher, N. & Lascarides, A. (2003). Logics of Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Besnard, P. & Hunter, A. (2008). Elements of Argumentation. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Bod, R., Hay, J. & Jannedy, S. (2003). Probabilistic Linguistics. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Byrne, R. M. J. (2005). The Rational Imagination. How People Create Alternatives to Reality. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Carel, M. (2011). L’entrelacement argumentatif. Lexique, discours et blocs sémantiques. Paris: Honoré Champion. [Google Scholar]
- Crupi, V., Fitelson, B. et Tentori, K.(2008). Probability, confirmation and the conjunction fallacy. Thinking and Reasoning, 14, 182–199. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Dayal, V. (2016). Questions. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Ducrot, O. (1972). Dire et ne pas dire. Paris: Hermann. [Google Scholar]
- Ducrot, O. (1980). Les échelles argumentatives. Paris: Éditions de Minuit. [Google Scholar]
- Ducrot, O. (1988). Topoi et formes topiques. Bulletin d’Etudes de Linguistique Française (Tokyo), 22, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
- Eckardt, R & Beltrama, A. (2019). Evidentials and questions. Dans C. Pinon (éd), Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 12, 121–155. [Google Scholar]
- van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., Krabbe E. C. W., Snoeck Henkemans, A. F., Verheij, B. et Wagemans, J. H. M. (2014). Handbook of Argumentation Theory. Dordrecht: Springer. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Erk, K. (2022). The probabilistic turn in semantics and pragmatics. Annual Review of Linguistics, 8, 101–121. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Fillmore, C. J. (1976). Frame semantics and the nature of language. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 280, 20–32. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Fitelson, B. (2001). Studies in Bayesian Confirmation Theory. Thèse de doctorat, University of Wisconsin. [Google Scholar]
- Franke, M. et Jäger, G. (2016). Probabilistic pragmatics, or why Bayes’rule is probably important for pragmatics. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, 35, 1, 3–44 [Google Scholar]
- Groenendjk, J. & Stokhoff, M. (1984). Studies on the semantics of questions and the pragmatics of answers. Thèse de doctorat. Université d’Amsterdam. [Google Scholar]
- Ciardelli, I., Groenendijk, J. et Roelofsen, F. (2019). Inquisitive Semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Grusdt, B., Lassiter, D. et Franke, M. (2022). Probabilistic modeling of rational communication with conditionals. Semantics and Pragmatics, 15, 13, 1–59. [Google Scholar]
- Howson, C. & Urbach, P. (2006). Scientific Reasoning. The Bayesian Approach. Chicago et La Salle: Open Court, 3ème édition. [Google Scholar]
- Jayez, J. (2005). How many are several? Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 19, 187–209 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Jayez, J. & Tovena, L. (2008). Presque and almost: how argumentation derives from comparative meaning. Dans O. Bonami & P. Cabredo Hofherr (éds.), Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 7, 217–240. [Google Scholar]
- Jayez, J. & Winterstein, G. (2013). Additivity and probability. Lingua, 132, 85–102. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Kaufmann, S., Over, D. E. et Sharma, G. (2023). Conditionals. Logic, Linguistics and Psychology. Cham (Suisse): Palgrave macmillan. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Kennedy, C. (2011). Ambiguity and vagueness: An overview. Dans Maienborn, C., von Heusinger, C. et Portner, P. (éds), Semantics. An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, vol 1, 507–535. [Google Scholar]
- Lassiter, D. (2016). Graded Modality. Qualitative and Quantitative Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Martin, P. (2009). Intonation du français. Paris: Armand Colin. [Google Scholar]
- Merin, A. (1999). Information, relevance and social decision-Making. Dans L. S. Moss, J. Ginzburg & M. de Rijke (éds), Logic, Language and Computation Vol. 2. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 179–221. [Google Scholar]
- Mundici, D. (2021). Deciding Koopman’s qualitative probability. Artificial Intelligence, 299, 103524. [Google Scholar]
- Oaksford, M. et Chater, N. (2007). Bayesian Rationality: The Probabilistic Approach to Human Reasoning. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Oaksford, M. et Chater, N. (2020). New paradigms in the psychology of reasoning. Annual Review of Psychology, 71, 305–330. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Pearl, J. (2009). Causality. Models, Reasoning and Inference. Cambridge (NY): Cambridge University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Pollock, J. L. (1995). Cognitive Carpentry. A Blueprint for How to Build a Person. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Radvansky, G. A. et Zacks J. M. (2014). Event Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Renkema, J. (2009). The Texture of Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Rett, J. (2015). The Semantics of Evaluativity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Schank, R. C. et Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding. An Inquiry into Human Knowledge Structures. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum. [Google Scholar]
- Schank, R. C. (1982). Dynamic Memory. A Theory of Reminding and Learning in Computers and People. Cambridge (NY): Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Schulz, M. (2017). Counterfactuals and Probability. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech Acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge (NY): Cambridge University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Skovgaard-Olsen, N., Collins, P., Krzyżanowska, K., Hahn, U. et Klauer, K. C. (2019). Cancellation, negation, and rejection. Cognitive Psychology, 108, 42–71. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Solt, S. (2015). Vagueness and imprecision: Empirical foundations. Annual Review of Linguistics, 1, 107–127. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Tentori, K., Crupi, V., Bonini, N. & Osherson, D. (2007). Comparison of confirmation measures. Cognition, 103, 107–119. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Walton, D. (2013). Methods of Argumentation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Winterstein, G. (2010). La dimension probabiliste des marqueurs de discours. Nouvelles perspectives sur l’argumentation dans la langue. Thèse de doctorat. Université Paris Diderot. [Google Scholar]
- Zeevat, H. et Schmitz, H.-C. (éds) (2015). Bayesian Natural Language Semantics and Pragmatics. Cham (Suisse): Springer. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Zenker, F. (éd) (2013). Bayesian Argumentation. The practical side of probability. Dordrecht: Springer. [Google Scholar]