Open Access
| Numéro |
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 191, 2024
9e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Numéro d'article | 12006 | |
| Nombre de pages | 17 | |
| Section | Sémantique | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202419112006 | |
| Publié en ligne | 28 juin 2024 | |
- Aikhenvald, A. (2012). The essence of mirativity. Linguistic Typology, 16, 435–485. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Asher, N. (1993). Reference to abstract objects in discourse. Dordrecht, Boston et London: Kluwer. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Asher, N., Vieu, L. (2005). Subordinating and coordinating discourse relations. Lingua, 115, 591–610. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Büring, D. (2014). (Contrastive) Topic. In C. Féry et I. Shin (éds). Handbook of information structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 64–85. [Google Scholar]
- Champollion, L. (2015). Distributivity, collectivity and cumulativity. In L. Matthewson, C. Meier., H. Rullmann et T. Zimmermann (éds), Companion to Semantics, Hoboken: Wiley Blackwell, 1–38. [Google Scholar]
- Clark H., Haviland S. (1977). Comprehension and the Given-New Contract. In R. Freedle (éd), Discourse Production and Comprehension. New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation, 1–40. [Google Scholar]
- Corteel, C., Van Peteghem L., (2015). SN même vs. SN lui-même: quand même doit-il s’appuyer sur un pronom?. Zeitschrift für französische Sprache une Literatur, 125, 115–133. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Declerck, R. (1988). Studies in copular sentences, clefts and pseudo-clefts. Leuven: Leuven University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Ducrot, O. (1980). Les échelles argumentatives. Paris: Editions de Minuit. [Google Scholar]
- Fauconnier, G. (1975). Pragmatic scales and logical structure. Linguistic Inquiry, 6(3), 353–375. [Google Scholar]
- Gast, V., Van der Auwera, J. (2011). Scalar additive operators in the languages of Europe. Language, 87(1), 2–54. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Hobbs, J. (1979). Coherence and coreference. Cognitive Science, 3, 67–90. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Hoeksema, J. (1998). Corpus study of negative polarity items. In IV-V Jornades de corpus lingüístics 1996–1997. Barcelona: IULA, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, 67–86. [Google Scholar]
- Horn, L. (1989). A natural history of negation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar]
- Jasinskaja, K., Karagjosova, E. (2020). Rhetorical relations. In D. Gutzmann (éd). The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Semantics. Hoboken: Wiley Blackwell, 1–29. [Google Scholar]
- Kay, P. (1990). Even. Linguistics and Philosophy, 13, 59–111. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Kleiber, G. (1998). Tout et ses domaines: sur la structure tout + déterminant + N. In A. Englebert, M. Pierrard, L. Rosier et D. Van Raemdonck (éds). La ligne claire. De la linguistique à la grammaire. Mélanges offerts à M. Wilmet à l’occasion de son 60e anniversaire. Bruxelles: De Boeck Supérieur. 87–98. [Google Scholar]
- Kleiber, G., Vassiliadou, H. (2009). Sur la relation d’Élaboration: des approches intuitives aux approches formelles. Journal of French Language Studies, 19, 183–205. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- König, E. (1991). The meaning of focus particles. A comparative perspective. London and New York: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
- Krifka, L. (2012). Information structure: overview and linguistic issues. In M. Krifka et R. Musan (éds). The expression of information structure, Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter, 1–45 [Google Scholar]
- Lambrecht, K. (1994). Information structure and sentence form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Lambrecht, K. (2001). A framework for the analysis of cleft constructions. Linguistics, 39–3, 463–516. [Google Scholar]
- Lambrecht, K. (2002). Topic, focus and secondary predication: the French presentational relative construction. In C. Beyssade, R. Bok-Bennema, F. Drijkoningen et P. Monachesi (éds). Romance languages and linguistic theory 2000. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 171–212. [Google Scholar]
- Mann, T., Thompson, S. (1988). Rhetorical Structure Theory: toward a functional theory of text organization. Text, 8(3), 243–281. [Google Scholar]
- Mari, A., Tovena, L. (2006). An additive and a scalar particle: the case of the Italian ‘neppure’ and its French counterparts. In J. P. Montreuil et C. Nishida (éds). New Perspectives on Romance Linguistics. Vol. 1. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 187–200. [Google Scholar]
- Muller, C. (1978). La négation explétive dans les constructions complétives. Langue française, 39, 76–103. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Prince, E. (1986). On the syntactic marking of the presupposed open proposition. Papers from the 22nd regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 208–222. [Google Scholar]
- Reinhart, T. (1981). Pragmatics and linguistics: an analysis of sentence topics. Philosophica, 27(11), 53–94. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Riester, A., Brunetti L., De Kuthy K. (2018). Annotation guidelines for Questions Under Discussion and Information Structure. In E. Adamou, K. Haude et M. Van Hove (éds). Information Structure in Lesser-described Languages. Studies in Prososdy and Syntax. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 403–444. [Google Scholar]
- Riester, A. (2019). Constructing QUD-Trees. In M. Zimmerman, K. Heusinger et Onea, E. (éds). Questions in Discourse. Vol. 2. Pragmatics. Leiden: Brill, 164–193. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Roberts, C. (2012). Information structure: toward an integrated formal theory of pragmatics. Semantics and Pragmatics, 5, 1–69. [Google Scholar]
- Rullmann, H. (1997). Even, polarity and scope. In M. Gibson, G. Wiebe et G. Libben (éds). Papers in experimental and theoretical linguistics. Vol. 4, Edmonton: University of Alberta. 40–64. [Google Scholar]
- Stede, M. (2008). RST Revisited: Disentangling Nuclearity. In C. Fabricius-Hansen et W. Ramm (éds). ‘Subordination’ and ‘coordination’ in sentence and text from a cross-linguistic perspective. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 33–58. [Google Scholar]
- Tovena, L. (2007). Comment devenir scalaire. Travaux de linguistique, 54,109–119. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Traugott, E. (2010). Revisting subjectification and intersubjectification. In K. Davidse, L. Vandelanotte et H. Cuyckens (éds). Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization. Berlin: De Mouton Gruyter, 29–70. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Visconti, J. (2005). On the origins of scalar particles in Italian. Journal of Historical Pragmatics, 6(2), 237–261. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Van Kuppevelt, J. (1995a). Main structure and side structure in discourse. Linguistics, 33, 809–833. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Van Kuppevelt, J. (1995b). Discourse structure, topicality and questioning. Journal of Linguistics, 31, 109–147. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Zeevat, H. (2009). Only as a mirative particle. Sprache und Daten Verarbeitung, 33, 179–196. [Google Scholar]