New insights into the typology of motion in the history of French : evidence from the manner verb lexicon | Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française

Open Access

Numéro		SHS Web Conf. Volume 191, 2024 9^e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française


Numéro d'article		03005
Nombre de pages		17
Section		Histoire du français : perspectives diachronique et synchronique
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202419103005
Publié en ligne		28 juin 2024

Acedo-Matellán, V. (2006). Prefixes in Latin and Romance and the satellite- vs. verb-framed distinction. In Universitat de Barcelona (Ed.), Actes del VII Congrés de Lingüística General, CD-ROM, Barcelona: Universitat de Barcelona. [Google Scholar]
Acedo-Matellán, V. (2010). Argument Structure and the Syntax-Morphology Interface. A Case Study in Latin and other Languages. Barcelona: Universitat de Barcelona [PhD thesis]. Downloadable at http://www.tdx.cat/bitstream/10803/21788/1/VAM_PhD_THESIS.pdf (accessed 8 November, 2012). [Google Scholar]
Acedo-Matellán, V., & Mateu, J. (2008). The path from satellite-framed Indo-European to verb-framed Romance: A lexical-syntactic account. Paper presented at the 10th Diachronic Issues in Generative Syntax conference (DIGS X), Cornell University, Ithaca, 7–9 August. [Google Scholar]
Acedo-Matellán, V., & Mateu, J. (2013). Satellite-Framed Latin vs. Verb-Framed Romance: A Syntactic Approach. Probus, 25, 227–265. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Aurnague, M. 2011. How motion verbs are spatial: The spatial foundations of intransitive motion verbs in French. Lingvisticae Investigationes, 34(1), 1–34. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Beavers, J., Levin, B., & Tham, W. S. (2010). The typology of motion expressions revisited. Journal of Linguistics, 46(2), 331–377. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Berman, R. A., & Slobin, D. I. (1994). Relating Events in Narrative: A Crosslinguistic Developmental Study. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [Google Scholar]
Buridant, C. (1987). Les particules séparées en ancien français. In C. Buridant (ed.) Romanistique-Germanistique: une confrontation. Strasbourg: Presses universitaires de Strasbourg, 167–204. [Google Scholar]
Buridant, C. (2000). Grammaire nouvelle de l’ancien français. Paris: Sedes. [Google Scholar]
Burnett, H. & Tremblay, M. (2009). Variable-Behavior Ps and the Location of PATH in Old French. In E. O. Aboh, E. van der Linden, J. Quer & P. Sleeman (eds.) Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory: Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’ Amsterdam 2007. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 25–50. [Google Scholar]
Covington, M. A., & McFall, J. D. (2010). Cutting the Gordian Knot: The Moving-Average Type–Token Ratio (MATTR). Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 17(2), 94–100. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
DMF (2020). Dictionnaire du Moyen Français, version 2020. ATILF - CNRS & Université de Lorraine. http://www.atilf.fr [accessed20December2023]. [Google Scholar]
Dufresne, M., Dupuis, F. & Longtin, C. (2001). Un changement dans la diachronie du français: la perte de la préfixation aspectuelle en -a. Revue Québécoise de Linguistique, 30, 33–54. [Google Scholar]
Dufresne, M., Dupuis, F., & Tremblay, M. (2000). The role of syntactic features in historical change. In S. N. Dworkin & D. Wanner (eds.), New Approaches to Old Problems. Issues in Romance Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 129–149. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Dufresne, M., Dupuis, F., & Tremblay, M. (2003). Preverbs and particles in Old French. In G. Booij & J. van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 2003. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 33–60. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Fanego, T. (2012). Motion events in English: The emergence and diachrony of manner salience from Old English to Late Modern English. Folia Linguistica Historica, 46(Historica-vol-33), 29–85. [Google Scholar]
Grobol, L. & Crabbé, B. (2021). Analyse en dépendances du français avec des plongements contextualisés. In Actes de la 28ème Conférence sur le Traitement Automatique des Langues Naturelles (TALNRÉCITAL 2021), Lille, France. < https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03223424 > [accessed20December2023]. [Google Scholar]
Grobol, L., Regnault, M., Ortiz Suarez, P., Sagot, B., Romary, L. & Crabbé, B. (2022). BERTrade: Using Contextual Embeddings to Parse Old French. In 13th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, European Language Resources Association, Marseille, France. < https://hal.science/hal-03736840 > [accessed20December2023]. [Google Scholar]
Heiden, S., Magué, J.-P., Pincemin, B. (2010). TXM: Une plateforme logicielle open-source pour la textométrie - conception et développement. In S. Bolasco, I. Chiari & L. Giuliano (eds) 10th International Conference on the Statistical Analysis of Textual Data - JADT 2010, Jun 2010, Rome, Italy. Edizioni Universitarie di Lettere Economia Diritto, 2 (3), 1021–1032 [accessed 20 December 2023]. [Google Scholar]
Iacobini, C., & Fagard, B. (2011). A diachronic approach to variation and change in the typology of motion event expression. Cahiers de Faits de langue, 3, 151–171. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Iacobini, C. (2012). Grammaticalization and innovation in the encoding of motion events. Folia Linguistica, 46, 359–386. [Google Scholar]
Iacobini, C. & Corona, L. (2016). “Romanes eunt domus”: where you can go with Latin morphology. Variation in motion expression between system and usage. In MMM 10 Online Proceedings, 73–87. < https://doi.org/10.26220/mmm.2726> > [accessed 2 April 2024]. [Google Scholar]
Kopecka, A. (2009). Continuity and change in the representation of motion events in French. In J. Guo, E. Lieven, N. Budwig, S. Ervin-Tripp, K. Nakamura, & S. Özçaliskan (eds.), Crosslinguistic Approaches to the Psychology of Language: Research in the Tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin. New York: Psychology Press, 415–426. [Google Scholar]
Kroch, A., & Santorini, B. (eds.) (2021). Penn-BFM Parsed Corpus of Historical French, version 1.0. < https://github.com/beatrice57/mcvf-plus-ppchf > [accessed20December2023]. [Google Scholar]
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B. & Christensen, R. H. B. (2017). lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1–26. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Moline, E., & Stosic, D. 2016. L’expression de la manière en français. Paris: Ophrys. [Google Scholar]
Posit team (2023). RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R. Posit Software, PBC, Boston, MA. URL http://www.posit.co/ [Google Scholar]
Schøsler, L. (2008). L’expression des traits manière et direction des verbes de mouvement: Perspectives diachroniques et typologiques. In E. Stark, R. Schmidt, & E. Stoll (eds.), Romanische Syntax im Wandel: [Festgabe zum 65. Geburtstag von Wulf Oesterreicher]. Tübingen: Narr Francke Attempo Verlag, 113–132. [Google Scholar]
Slobin, D. I. (1997). Mind, Code and Text. In J. L. Bybee, J. Haiman, & S. A. Thompson (eds.), Essays on Language Function and Language Type: Dedicated to T. Givón. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 437–467. [Google Scholar]
Slobin, D. I. (2004). The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (eds.), Relating Events in Narrative: Vol. 2. Typological and Contextual Perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 219–257. [Google Scholar]
Stolova, N. (2015). Cognitive Linguistics and Lexical Change: Motion Verbs from Latin to Romance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [Google Scholar]
Stosic, D. (2009). La notion de « manière » dans la sémantique de l’espace. Langages, 175, 103–121. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Stosic, D. (2019). Manner as a cluster concept: What does lexical coding of manner of motion tell us about manner?. In M. Aurnague & D. Stosic (eds), The Semantics of Dynamic Space in French Descriptive, Experimental and Formal Studies on Motion Expression. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 141–178. [Google Scholar]
Talmy, L. (1972). Semantic Structures in English and Atsugewi. [PhD Dissertation] Department of Linguistics, University of California, Berkeley. [Google Scholar]
Talmy, L. (1985). Lexicalization Patterns: Semantic Structure in Lexical Forms. In T. Shopen (ed.) Language Typology and Syntactic Description, vol. III: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 57–149. [Google Scholar]
Talmy, L. (1991). Path to realization: a typology of event integration. Buffalo Working Papers in Linguistics, 91(1), 147–187. [Google Scholar]
Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. [Google Scholar]
Troberg, M., & Burnett, H. (2017). From Latin to Modern French: A Punctuated Shift. In E. Mathieu & R. Truswell (eds.), Micro-Change and Macro-Change in Diachronic Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
Verkerk, A. (2014). The Evolutionary Dynamics of Motion Event Encoding. [PhD Dissertation] Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics. [Google Scholar]