Les si-indépendantes dans l’interaction : un continuum d’insubordination | Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française

Open Access

Issue		SHS Web Conf. Volume 191, 2024 9^e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française


Article Number		01016
Number of page(s)		17
Section		Discours, pragmatique et interaction
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202419101016
Published online		28 juin 2024

Auer, P. (2014). Syntactic structures and their symbiotic guests: notes on analepsis from the perspective of on-line syntax. Pragmatics, 24 (3), 533–560. [Google Scholar]
Avanzi, M., Béguelin, M.-J. & Diémoz, F. (Eds.) 2012-2019. OFROM: Corpus oral de français de Suisse romande. http://www.unine.ch/ofrom. [Google Scholar]
Lefeuvre, F. & Rossi-Gensane, N. (2017). Les interrogatives indirectes en discours informel oral. Langue française, 196 (4), 51–74. [Google Scholar]
Beijering, K., Kaltenböck, G. & Sansiñena, M. (2019). Insubordination: Theoretical and Empirical Issues. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Blanche-Benveniste, C. (2010). Le français: usages de la langue parlée. Leuven: Peeters. [Google Scholar]
Chanet, C. (2001). 1700 occurrences de la particule quoi en français parlé contemporain: approche de la « distribution » et des fonctions en discours. Revue en ligne Marges Linguistiques 2, 56–80. http://www.marges-linguistiques.com [Google Scholar]
Corminboeuf, G. (2010). Les structures nominales à interprétation hypothétique. Format syntaxique et constantes sémantiques. In M.-J. Béguelin, M. Avanzi & G. Corminboeuf (Eds): La Parataxe, t. 2, Berne: Lang, 29–46. [Google Scholar]
Corminboeuf, G. & Horlacher, A.-S. (2016). « La projection en macro-syntaxe et en linguistique interactionnelle: dimensions théoriques et empiriques ». Langue française, 192, 15–36. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Corminboeuf, G. & Jahn, T. (2020). Taxinomie des constructions en si dans un corpus de français oral. L’exemple d’OFROM. Studia Linguistica Romanica, 4, 195–220. [Google Scholar]
Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2011). Grammaticalization and Conversation. In H. Narrog & B. Heine (Eds.): The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 424-437. [Google Scholar]
Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2018). Finding a place for body movement in grammar. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 51, 22–25. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Couper-Kuhlen, E. & Selting, M. (2018). Interactional Linguistics. Studying language in social interaction, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
Couper-Kuhlen, E. & Thompson, S. A. (2022). Can termporal clauses be insubordinate? Evidence from English conversation. Interactional Linguistics, 2 (2), 165–189. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Dargnat, M. (2008). Constructionnalité des parataxes conditionnelles. Paris: Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française, 2467–2482. [Google Scholar]
Debaisieux, J.-M. (1994). Fonctionnement de parce que en français parlé. Thèse de doctorat en sciences du langage, Université de Nancy 2. [Google Scholar]
Debaisieux, M.-J., Deulofeu H. J. & Martin P. (2008). Pour une syntaxe sans ellipse. In J. C. Pitavy & M. Bigot (Eds): Ellipse et effacement. P.U. St. Etienne, 225–246. [Google Scholar]
Debaisieux, M.-J., Martin, P. & Deulofeu, H.-J. (2019). Apparent insubordination as discourse patterns in French. In K. Beijering, G. Kaltenböck & M. Sansiñena (Eds): Insubordination. Theoretical and Empirical Issues. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter, 349-383. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Deulofeu, J. (1988). La syntaxe de que en français parlé et le problème de la subordination. Recherches sur le français parlé, 8, 79–104. [Google Scholar]
De Stefani, E. (2021). If-clauses, their grammatical consequents, and their embodied consequence: Organizing joint attention in guided tours”. In L. Keevallik, S. Pekarek Doehler & X. Li (Eds): Frontiers in Communication. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.661165 [Google Scholar]
Deulofeu, J., Debaisieux, J.-M. & Martin, P. (2019). Apparent insubordination as discourse patterns in French. In K. Beijering, G. Kaltenböck & M. Sansiñena (Eds): Insubordination Theoretical and empirical issues. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter, 349-83. [Google Scholar]
Drew, P. & Walker, T. (2010). Citizens’ emergency calls: Requesting assistance in calls to the police. In M. Coulthard & A. Johnson (Eds.): The Routledge Handbook of Forensic Linguistics. London: Routledge, 95-110. [Google Scholar]
Dwyer, A. (2016). Ordinary insubordination as transient discourse. In N. Evans & H. Watanabe (Eds): Insubordination. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 183-208. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Evans, N. (2007). Insubordination and its uses. In I. Nikolaeva (Ed.): Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations. [Google Scholar]
Evans, N. & Watanabe, H. (2016) (Eds). Insubordination. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
González-Martínez, E. (2023). « Faire du coude » avec un énoncé « il y a x »: inciter à l’action et recruter une personne responsable d’agir en milieu hospitalier. Langage et société, 179, 111–139. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Gras, P. (2016). Revisiting the functional typology of insubordination: que-initial sentences in Spanish. In N. Evans & H. Watanabe (Eds): Insubordination. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 113-144. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Gras, P. & Sansiñena, M. (2015). An interactional account of discourse-connective que-constructions in Spanish. Text & Talk, 35 (4), 505–529. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Grevisse, M. (2016). Le bon usage. Grammaire, langue française. Paris/Louvain-la-Neuve: De Boeck-Duculot. [Google Scholar]
Günthner, S. (1999). Entwickelt sich der Konzessivkonnektor obwohl zum Diskursmarker? Grammatikalisierungstendenzen im gesprochenen Deutsch. Linguistische Berichte, 180, 409–446. [Google Scholar]
Günthner, S. (2020). From complex wenn-constructions to insubordinate (‘stand-alone’) conditionals in everyday spoken German. In Y. Maschler, S. Pekarek Doehler, J. Lindström & L. Keevallik (Eds): Emergent Syntax for Conversation: Clausal patterns and the organization of action. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 185-220. [Google Scholar]
Haiman, J. & Thompson, S. A. (Eds) (1984). Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse. Typological Studies in Language, 18, 275–330. [Google Scholar]
Heine, B., Kaltenböck, G., Kuteva, T. & Long, H. (2019). On the Rise of Discourse Markers. In A. Haselow & S. Hancil (Eds): Studies at the Grammar-Discourse Interface: Discourse Markers and Discourse-Related Grammatical Phenomena. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [Google Scholar]
Heinemann, T. & Traverso, V. (2009). Complaining in interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 2381–2384. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Horlacher, A.-S. (2021). Compound and independent if-clauses at the hairdresser’s: negotiating the procedures of the treatment. Présentation orale, 17th International Pragmatics Conference, 27 juin – 2 juillet 2021, Winterthur, Switzerland. [Google Scholar]
Horlacher, A.-S. (2022). Negative requests within hair salons: Grammar and embodiment in action formation. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.689563 [Google Scholar]
Horlacher, A.-S. & Pekarek Doehler, S. (2022). Si vous avez quelqu’un sous la main: les si-indépendantes en tant que format de requête. Langue française, 216 (4), 47–61. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Jeanneret, T. (1999). La coénonciation en français. Approches discursive, conversationnelle et syntaxique. Berne: Lang. [Google Scholar]
Kaltenböck, G. & Keizer, E. (2022). Insubordinate if-clauses in FDG: degrees of independence. Open Linguistics, 8 (1), 675–698. https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2022-0212. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Keevallik, L. (2013). The interdependence of bodily demonstrations and clausal syntax. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 46 (1), 1–21. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Keevallik, L. (2018). What does embodied interaction tell us about grammar? Research on Language and Social Interaction, 51 (1), 1–21. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Lastres-López, C. (2020). Beyond conditionality: On the pragmaticalization of interpersonal ifconstructions in English conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 157, 68–83. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Laury, R. (2012). Syntactically Non-integrated Finnish jos ‘If’-Conditional Clauses as Directives. Discourse Processes, 49, 213–242. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Laury, R., Lindholm, C. & Lindström, J. K. (2013). Syntactically non-integrated conditional clauses in spoken Finnish and Swedish. In E. Havu & I. Hyvärinen (Eds): Comparing and contrasting syntactic structures: From dependency to quasi-subordination. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique de Helsinki, LXXXVI, 231-270. [Google Scholar]
Lehmann, C. (1988). Towards a typology of clause linkage. In J. Haiman & S. A. Thompson (Eds): Clause combining in grammar and discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 181-225. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Lerner, G. H. (1991). On the Syntax of Sentences-in-Progress. Language in Society, 20, 441–458. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Lindström, J., Lindholm C. & Laury, R. (2016). The interactional emergence of conditional clauses as directives: constructions, trajectories and sequences of actions. Language Science, 58, 8–21. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Lindström, J., Laury, R. & Lindholm, C. (2019). Insubordination and the Contextually Sensitive Emergence of If-Requests in Swedish and Finnish Institutional Talk-In-Interaction. In K. Beijering, G. Kaltenböck & M. Sansiñena (Eds): Insubordination: Theoretical and Empirical Issues. Berlin: De Gruyter, 55-78. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Lombardi Vallauri, E. (2016). Insubordinated Conditionals in Spoken and Non-Spoken Italian. In N. Evans & H. Watanabe (Eds): Insubordination. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [Google Scholar]
Maschler, Yael. (2018). The on-line emergence of Hebrew insubordinate she- (‘that/which/who’) clauses: A usage-based perspective on so-called ‘subordination’. Studies in Language, 42 (3), 669–707. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Maschler, Y. (2020). The Insubordinate – Subordinate Continuum Prosody, Embodied Action, and the Emergence of Hebrew Complex Syntax. In Y. Maschler, S. Pekarek Doehler, J. Lindström & Leelo Keevallik (Eds): Emergent Syntax for Conversation: Clausal Patterns and the Organization of Action. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 87-126. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Maschler, Y., Pekarek Doehler, S. Lindström, J. Keevallik, L. (Eds) (2020). Emergent Syntax for Conversation: Clausal Patterns and the Organization of Action. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Maschler, Y. & Pekarek Doehler, S. (2022). Pseudo-cleft-like structures in Hebrew and French conversation: The syntax-lexicon-body interface. Lingua, 280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2022.103397 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Mithun, M. (2008). The extension of dependency beyond the sentence. Language, 84 (1), 69–119. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Mondada, L. (2014). The local constitution of multimodal resources for social interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 65, 137–156. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Mondada, L. (2018). Multiple Temporalities of Language and Body Interaction: Challenges for Transcribing Multimodality. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 51 (1), 85–106. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Mondada, L. (2019). Conventions de transcription pour la multimodalité (dernière version 2019: https://www.lorenzamondada.net/_files/ugd/ba0dbb_986ddd4993a04a57acf20ea06e2b9a34.pdf [Google Scholar]
Nevile, M. (2015). The embodied turn in research on language and social interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 48 (2), 121–151. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Ochs, E., Schegloff, E. A. & Thompson, S. A. (1996) (Eds): Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Ogden, R. (2013). Clicks and percussives in English conversation. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 43 (3), 299–320. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Oloff, F. (2014). Analyse multimodale de complétions différées suite aux interventions collaboratives. In L. Mondada (Ed.): Corps en interaction: participation, spatialité, mobilité. Lyon: ENS Éditions, 107–143. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Olsher, D. (2004). Talk and Gesture: The Embodied Completion of Sequential Actions in Spoken Interaction. In R. Gardner et J. Wagner (Eds): Second Language Conversations. London: Continuum, 221-245. [Google Scholar]
Ono, T. & Thompson, S. A. (1995). What can conversation tell us about syntax? In P. W. Davis (Ed.): Alternative linguistics: descriptive and theoretical modes. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 213–271. [Google Scholar]
Patard, A. (2014). Réflexions sur l’origine de l’insubordination. Le cas de trois insubordonnées hypothétiques du français. Langages, 196, 109–130. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Pekarek Doehler, S., De Stefani, E. & Horlacher, A.-S. (2015). Time and Emergence in Grammar. Leftdislocation, right-dislocation, topicalization and hanging topic in French talk-in-interaction. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Pekarek Doehler, S., Keevallik, L. & Li, X. (Eds) (2022). The grammar-body interface in social interaction. Frontiers in Psychology, 1-3. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.875696. [Google Scholar]
Pekarek Doehler, S. & Horlacher, A.-S. (à paraître). An interactional grammar of insubordination: the case of si- ‘if’-clauses. In J. Steensig et al. (Eds.): Grammar in Action: Building Comprehensive Grammars of Talk-in-Interaction. Amsterdam: Benjamins (Studies in Language and Social Interaction). [Google Scholar]
Portes, C. & Bertrand, R. (2005). De la valeur interactionnelle du contour « continuatif » en français. Travaux interdisciplinaires du Laboratoire Parole et Langage, 24, 139–157. [Google Scholar]
Riegel, M., Pellat, J.-C. & Rioul, R. (2009 [1994]). Grammaire méthodique du français. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. [Google Scholar]
Sansiñena, M., De Smet, H. & Cornillie, B. (2015). Between subordinate and insubordinate. Paths toward complementizer-initial main clauses. Journal of Pragmatics, 77, 3–19. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Sansiñena, M. (2019). Patterns of (in)dependence. In K. Beijering, G. Kaltenböck & M. Sansiñena (Eds): Insubordination: Theoretical and Empirical Issues. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter. [Google Scholar]
Schneider, S. (2007). Reduced Parenthetical Clauses as Mitigators: A corpus study of spoken French, Italian and Spanish. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Skogmyr Marian, K. (2021). Initiating a complaint: change over time in French L2 speakers’ practices. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 54, 163–182. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Stoenica, I.-M. (2020). Actions et conduites mimo-gestuelles dans l’usage conversationnel des relatives en français. Berne: Lang. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Stoenica, I.-M., Pekarek Doehler, S. & Horlacher, A.-S. (2020). Emergent complex noun phrases: On-line trajectories of ‘relativized’ NPs in French talk-in- interaction. In S. Thompson & Y. Ono (Eds): The ‘Noun Phrase’ across languages. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 43-70. [Google Scholar]
Sweetser, E. (1990). From etymology to pragmatics: metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Streeck, J. (2018). Grammaticalization and bodily action: do they go together? Research on Language and Social Interaction, 51 (1), 26–32. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Stivers, T. & Sidnell, J. (2005). Introduction: Multimodal interaction. Semiotica, 156 (1), 1–20. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Van Valin, R. (1984). A typology of syntactic relations in clause linkage. Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society, 542–558. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Zinken, J. (2016). Chapitre ‘Nudging and Appealing’. In Requesting Responsibility: The Morality of Grammar in Polish and English Family Interaction. New York: Oxford University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]