Open Access
| Numéro |
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 78, 2020
7e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Numéro d'article | 12002 | |
| Nombre de pages | 13 | |
| Section | Sémantique | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20207812002 | |
| Publié en ligne | 4 septembre 2020 | |
- Anscombre, J.-C., (2001). Dénomination, sens et référence dans une théorie des stéréotypes nominaux. Cahiers depraxématique, 36, 43-72. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Anscombre J.-C., (2012). Le problème de l’antonymie dans le champ parémique. In J.-C. Anscombre, A., Rodriguez Somolinos, S., Jordana- Gômez Ferary (éds), Voix et marqueurs du discours: des connecteurs à l’argument d’autorité. Lyon: ENS Editions, 121-140. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Anscombre J.-C., (2016). Sur la détermination du sens des proverbes. Etudes et travaux d’Eur’ORBEM, 1, 39-53. [Google Scholar]
- Fauconnier, G. & Lakoff, G. (2009). On metaphor and blending. Cognitive Semiotics, 5, 393-399. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Fauconnier, G. & Turner, M. (1996). Blending as a central process of grammar. In A. Goldberg (éd.), Conceptual structure, discourse, and language. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 113-130. [Google Scholar]
- Fauconnier, G. & Turner, M. (1998). Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science, 22, 33-187. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Fauconnier, G. & Turner, M. (2000). Compression and global insight. Cognitive Linguistics, 11, 283304. [Google Scholar]
- Fauconnier, G. & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think. New York: Basic Books. [Google Scholar]
- Fauconnier, G. & Turner, M. (2003). Polysemy and conceptual blending. In B. Nerlich, Z. Todd, V. Herman, D. Clarke (éds.), Polysemy: Patterns of meaning in mind and language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 79-94. [Google Scholar]
- Fradin, B. (1984). Anaphorisation et stéréotypes nominaux. Lingua, 64, 325-369. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, B. (1973). Toward a theory of proverb meaning. Proverbium, 22, 821-827. [Google Scholar]
- Kovecses, Z. (1986). Metaphors of anger, pride, and love: A lexical approach to the structure of concepts. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Kovecses, Z. (1988). The language of love: the semantics of passion in conversational English. Lewisburg, PA: Bucknell University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Kovecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in culture: universality and variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Kovecses, Z. (2011). Recent developments in metaphor theory: Are the new views rival ones? Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 9, 11-25. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (éd.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press, 202-251. [Google Scholar]
- Lakoff, G. (2008). The neural theory of metaphor. In R. W. Gibbs (éd.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought. New York: Cambridge University Press, 17-38. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: Chicago University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books. [Google Scholar]
- Lakoff, G. & Turner, M. (1989). More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Lemghari, E. (2017). Conceptual metaphors as motivation for proverbs lexical polysemy. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 3, 57-70. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Lemghari, E. Metaphorical blending in complex proverbs. A case study. Metaphor and the Social World (sous presse). [Google Scholar]
- Milner, G. B. (1969). De l’armature des locutions proverbiales. Essai de taxonomie sémantique. L’Homme, 9(3), 49-70. [Google Scholar]
- Putnam, H. (1975). Philosophical Papers, Vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]