Open Access
Numéro |
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 191, 2024
9e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française
|
|
---|---|---|
Numéro d'article | 14001 | |
Nombre de pages | 12 | |
Section | Syntaxe | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202419114001 | |
Publié en ligne | 28 juin 2024 |
- Abeillé, A. et Godard, D. (2021), La grande grammaire du français. Actes sud. [Google Scholar]
- Ashby, W. J. (1977), Interrogative forms in Parisian French. Semasia, 4: 35–52. [Google Scholar]
- Brehm, L. et Alday, P. M. (2022), Contrast coding choices in a decade of mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 125, 104334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2022.104334. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Brunetti, L., Tovena, L. M. et Yoo, H. (2022), French questions alternating between a reason and a manner interpretation. Linguistics Vanguard, 8(s2): 227–237. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2020-0130. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Brunetti, L., Yoo, H., Tovena, L. et Albar, R. (2021), French reason-comment (‘how’) questions: A view from prosody. Dans A. Trotzke et X. Villalba (dir.), Expressive Meaning Across Linguistic Levels and Frameworks. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Celle, A., Jugnet, A. et Lansari, L. (2021), Expressive questions in English and French: What the hell versus Mais qu’est-ce que. Dans A. Trotzke et X. Villalba (dir.), Expressive Meaning Across Linguistic Levels and Frameworks: 138–166. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198871217.003.0008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Celle, A. et Pélissier, M. (2022), Surprise questions in spoken French. Linguistics Vanguard, 8(s2): 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2020-0109. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Cornulier, B. de. (1974), Pourquoi et l’inversion du sujet non clitique. Dans C. Rohrer et N. Ruwet (dir.), Linguistische Arbeiten: Vol. 13. Études de syntaxe: Actes du Colloque Franco-Allemand de Grammaire Transformationnelle: 139–163. de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111611761-010 [Google Scholar]
- Dayal, V. (2016), Questions (First edition). Oxford surveys in semantics and pragmatics: Vol. 4. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Dekhissi, L. et Coveney, A. (2021). Le contexte linguistique des questions rhétoriques conflictuelles et la variation entre pourquoi et qu’est-ce que. Dans P. Larrivée et A. Guryev (dir.), Langue française: Vol. 212. Variantes formelles de l’interrogation: 123–137. [Google Scholar]
- Armand Colin. Desmets, M. et Gautier, A. (2009), « Comment n’y ai-je pas songé plus tôt ? », questions rhétoriques en comment. Travaux De Linguistique, 58(1): 107–125. https://doi.org/10.3917/tl.058.0107. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Drummond, A. (2016), IbexFarm (Version 0.3). 9). [Google Scholar]
- Farkas, D. F. (2022), Non-Intrusive Questions as a Special Type of Non-Canonical Questions. Journal of Semantics, 39(2): 295–337. https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffac001. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Featherston, S. (2021). Response Methods in Acceptability Experiments. Dans G. Goodall (dir.), The Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Syntax (p. 39–61). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108569620.003. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Fleury, D. (2021), Questions en comment de raison: La révision des attentes du locuteur [PhD]. Université de Paris/Université Paris Cité, Paris. https://u-paris.fr/theses/detail-dune-these/?id_these=3458. [Google Scholar]
- Fleury, D. et Tovena, L. (2018a), À propos des lectures des questions en comment. SHS Web of Conferences, 46, 12003. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20184612003. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Fleury, D. et Tovena, L. (2018b), Reason questions with comment are expressions of an attributional search. Dans Proceedings of the 22nd Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue -Full Papers. SEMDIAL. http://semdial.org/anthology/Z18-Fleury_semdial_0015.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- Fliessbach, J., Brunetti, L. et Yoo, H. (under review), On the overlapping discourse functions of Spanish ‘cómo que’ and French ‘comment ça’ interrogatives. Dans H. Metslang (dir.), Open Linguistics. Subjectivity and Intersubjectivity in Language. de Gruyter. [Google Scholar]
- Fontaine, J. J. R., Scherer, K. R. et Soriano, C. (dir.). (2013), Series in affective science. Components of emotional meaning: A sourcebook. Oxford University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Fournier, N. (1998), Grammaire du français classique. Belin SUP Lettres. Belin. [Google Scholar]
- Hamlaoui, F. (2011), On the role of phonology and discourse in Francilian French wh-questions. Journal of Linguistics, 47(1); 129–162. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226710000198. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Kédochim, F. et Guesser, S. (2020), On the readings of pourquoi in wh-questions. Revista Linguíʃtica:206–230. [Google Scholar]
- Kircher, R. (2016), The Matched‐Guise Technique. Dans H. Zhu (dir.), Guides to research methods in language and linguistics: Vol. 8. Research methods in intercultural communication: A practical guide: 196–211. Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119166283.ch13. [Google Scholar]
- Kohler, K. J. (2005), Timing and communicative functions of pitch contours. Phonetica, 62(2–4): 88–105. https://doi.org/10.1159/000090091. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Korzen, H. (1990), Pourquoi pourquoi est-il différent ? L’adverbial de cause et la classification des adverbiaux en général. Langue Française, 88(1): 60–79. https://doi.org/10.3406/lfr.1990.5753. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Lambert, W. E., Hodgson, R. C., Gardner, R. C. et Fillenbaum, S. (1960), Evaluational reactions to spoken languages. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 60: 44–51. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0044430. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Lambrecht, K. (1981), Topic, antitopic and verb agreement in non-standard French. Pragmatics & beyond: 2:6. J. Benjamins. [Google Scholar]
- Liddell, T. M. et Kruschke, J. K. (2018), Analyzing ordinal data with metric models: What could possibly go wrong? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 79: 328–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.08.009. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Massot, B. et Rowlett, P. (2013), Le débat sur la diglossie en France: Aspects scientifiques et politiques Journal of French Language Studies, 23(1): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959269512000336. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Myers, L. L. et Pellet, S. (2014), Pourquoi in Spoken French: Corpus-based function-form mapping. Dans S. Katz Bourns et L. L. Myers (dir.), Pragmatics & Beyond New series: Vol. 244. Perspectives on Linguistic Structure and Context (Vol. 244: 157–182). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.244.08mye. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Osgood, C. E. (1952), The nature and measurement of meaning. Psychological Bulletin, 49(3): 197–237. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0055737. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Posit team. (2023), RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R. http://www.posit.co/. [Google Scholar]
- Quillard, V. (2001), La diversité des formes interrogatives: comment l’interpréter ? Langage Et Société, 95(1): 57–72. https://doi.org/10.3917/ls.095.0057. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- R Core Team. (2023), R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. https://www.Rproject.org/. [Google Scholar]
- Smirnova, A. et Abeillé, A. (2021), Question particles ça and donc in French: A corpus study. Linguistic Research, 38(2): 239–269. [Google Scholar]
- Sorensen, T., Hohenstein, S. et Vasishth, S. (2016), Bayesian linear mixed models using Stan: A tutorial for psychologists, linguists, and cognitive scientists. The Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 12(3): 175–200. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.12.3175 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Sullivan, G. M. et Artino, A. R. (2013), Analyzing and interpreting data from likert-type scales. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 5(4): 541–542. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-5-4-18 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Thiberge, G. (2020), Acquisition et maîtrise des interrogatives partielles en français: La variation sociolinguistique comme outil interactionnel [Doctoral Thesis]. Université de Paris, Paris. [Google Scholar]
- Tovena, L. M. (2023), Asking about the reason for an effect, and some consequences for the analysis of wh-interrogatives. Dans Ł. Jędrzejowski et C. Umbach (dir.), Non-Interrogative Subordinate Wh-Clauses (p. 381–409). Oxford University PressOxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192844620.003.0012. [Google Scholar]
- Trotzke, A. et Czypionka, A. (2022), The pragmatics of surprise-disapproval questions: An empirical study. Linguistics Vanguard, 8(s2), 239–249. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2020-0107. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Tsai, W.-T. D. (2008), Left periphery and how-why alternations. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 17, 83–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-008-9021-0. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]