Open Access
| Numéro |
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 191, 2024
9e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Numéro d'article | 12010 | |
| Nombre de pages | 12 | |
| Section | Sémantique | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202419112010 | |
| Publié en ligne | 28 juin 2024 | |
- Condoravdi, C. & S. Lauer (2016). Anankastic conditionals are just conditionals. Semantics & Pragmatics, 9, 1–69. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Costantini, F. (2011). Subjunctive obviation in nonargument clauses. University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics, 21, 39–61. [Google Scholar]
- Costantini, F. (2013). Evidence for the competition-based analysis of subjunctive obviation from relative and adverbial clauses in Italian. In S. Baauw Sergio, F. Drijkoningen, L. Meroni & M. Pinto (eds.). Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2011: Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’ Utrecht 2011, 75–92. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [Google Scholar]
- Costantini, F. (2016). Subject Obviation as a Semantic Failure: a Preliminary Account. Annali di Ca’ Foscari. Serie occidentale, 50, 109–132. HYPERLINK “http://doi.org/10.14277/2499–1562/AnnOc-50–16-5” [Google Scholar]
- Damourette, J. & É. Pichon (1968). Des mots à la pensée: essai de grammaire de la langue française, IV: La subordonnée intégrative. Paris: Éditions d’Artrey. [Google Scholar]
- Farkas, D. (1988). On obligatory control. Linguistics & Philosophy, 11, 27–58. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Farkas, D. (1992). On Obviation. In Ivan A. Sag & Anna Szabolcsi (eds.), Lexical matters, 85–109. Stanford: CSLI Pub. [Google Scholar]
- Feldhausen, I. & S. Buchczyk (2021). Revisiting subjunctive obviation in French: a formal acceptability judgment study. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics, 6.1: 59, 1–14, doi:https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.1219 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Goncharov, J. (2022). What weakness of will can teach us. In Ö. Bakay, B. Pratley and E. Neu. (eds.) Proceedings of the Fifty-Second Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, vol.1, 297–306. Rutgers University. [Google Scholar]
- Gougenheim, G. (1962). Système grammatical de la langue française. Paris: Éditions d’Artrey. [Google Scholar]
- Karasawa, R. (2019), Syusetu-to zyuuzokusetu-no syugo-ga ittisitemo QUE setuzokuhoo-ga motiirareru baai-ni tuite [Sur les cas où le complément au subjonctif est utilisé malgré la coréférence entre le sujet principal et le sujet subordonné], Mémoire de recherche, Master en langue et littérature françaises, Faculté des Lettres, l’Université Aoyama Gakuin. [Google Scholar]
- Lemhagen, G. (1979). La concurrence entre l’infinitif et la subordonnée complétive introduite par que en français contemporain. Uppsala: Acta universitatis upsaliensis. [Google Scholar]
- Levinson, D. (2003). Probabilistic Model-theoretical Semantics for want. Proceedings of SALT, 13, 222–239. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Nazarenko, A. (2000). La cause et son expression en français. Paris: Ophrys. [Google Scholar]
- Portner, P. (2018). Mood. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Ruwet, N. (1990). Je veux partir / *Je veux que je parte: On the Distribution of Finite Complements and Infinitival Complements in French. In Syntax and Human Experience. (Edited and translated by J. Goldsmith), 1–55. The University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar]
- Sæbø, K.J. (2012). Adverbial clauses. In K. von Heusinger, C. Maienborn & P. Portner (eds.) Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning vol 2, Ch.55, 1420–1441. Berlin: de Gruyter. [Google Scholar]
- Sæbø, K. (2021) Anankastic Conditionals. In D. Gutzmann, L. Matthewson, C. Meier, H. Rullmann and E. Zimmermann (eds) The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Semantics, Oxford: John Wiley & Sons, 65–90. doib 10.1002/9781118788516.sem107. [Google Scholar]
- Schlenker, P. (2005). The Lazy Frenchman’s Approach to the Subjunctive: Speculations on Reference to Worlds and Semantic Defaults in the Analysis of Mood. In T. Geerts, I. van Ginneken & H. Jacobs (eds.). Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2003, 269–309. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [Google Scholar]
- Schlenker, P. (2011). Indexicality and De se reports. In K. von Heusinger, C. Maienborn & P. Portner (eds.) Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning. volume 2, Ch.61, 1561–1604. Berlin: de Gruyter. [Google Scholar]
- Soga, Y. (1992). Furansugo-ni okeru jyookyoo-no hyoogenhoo – koobun.doosijyohoo-no sentaku [Expression des situations en français - choix de la construction et du mode verbal]. Tokyo: Hakusuisha. [Google Scholar]
- Szabolcsi, A. (2004). Positive polarity negative polarity. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 22.2, 409–452. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Szabolcsi, A. (2010). Infinitives vs. subjunctives: What do we learn from obviation and from exemptions from obviation? http://www.nyu.edu/projects/szabolcsi/szabolcsi_obviation_march_2010.pdf [Google Scholar]
- Szabolcsi, A. (2021). Obviation in Hungarian: what is its scope, and is it due to competition?. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics, 6.1: 57, 1–27. doi:https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.1421 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Tovena, L., V. Déprez & J. Jayez (2004). Polarity Sensitive Items. In F. Corblin & H. de Swart (eds.). Handbook of French Semantics, 391–415. Stanford: CSLI Pub. [Google Scholar]