Open Access
| Numéro |
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 191, 2024
9e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Numéro d'article | 12008 | |
| Nombre de pages | 14 | |
| Section | Sémantique | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202419112008 | |
| Publié en ligne | 28 juin 2024 | |
- Aikhenvald, A. Y. 2003. A Grammar of Tariana, from Northwest Amazonia. Cambridge Grammatical Descriptions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Aikhenvald, A. Y. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Anderson, L. B. 1986. Evidentials, paths of change, and mental maps: Typologically regular asymmetries. In W. Chafe & J. Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, 273–312. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation. [Google Scholar]
- Bally, Ch. 1965. Linguistique générale et linguistique française. Berne: Francke. [Google Scholar]
- Benveniste, E. 1966. Problèmes de linguistique générale, tome I, Paris: Gallimard. [Google Scholar]
- Benveniste, E. 1974. Problèmes de linguistique générale, tome II, Paris: Gallimard [Google Scholar]
- Bergqvist, H. & S. Kittilä (eds.). 2019. Evidentiality, egophoricity and engagement. Studies in Diversity Linguistics 30. Berlin: Language Science Press. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3968344 [Google Scholar]
- Boye, K. 2012. Epistemic Meaning. A Crosslinguistic Functional-cognitive Study. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. [Google Scholar]
- Boye, K. 2012. Epistemic Meaning. A crosslinguistic and Functional-cognitive Study, Empirical Approaches to Language Typology, 43, De Gruyter Mouton. [Google Scholar]
- Colas-Blaise, M. et al. (eds). 2016. L’énonciation aujourd’hui, un concept clé des sciences du langage, Lambert-Lucas. [Google Scholar]
- Comrie, B. 1976. AspectiAn introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Comrie, B. 1985. Tense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Culioli, A. 1990. Pour une linguistique de l’énonciation, Opérations et représentations, Tome 1. Paris: Ophrys. [Google Scholar]
- Culioli, A. 1999. Pour une linguistique de l’énonciation, Formalisation et opérations de repérage, Tome 2, Paris: Ophys. [Google Scholar]
- Curry, H. B. & R. Feys. 1958. Combinatory logic (Vol. I). Amsterdam: North-Holland. [Google Scholar]
- de Haan, F. 1999. Evidentiality and Epistemic Modality: Setting boundaries. Southwest Journal of Linguistics 18: 83–101 [Google Scholar]
- Dendale, P. 1991. Le marquage épistémique de l’énoncé. Esquisse d’une théorie avec applications au français. Thèse de doctorat, UIA - Université d’Anvers, Ann Harbor, Dissertations Abstracts International (DA 9213900). [Google Scholar]
- Dendale, P. 2022. Evidential markers in French. In Wiemer, B. & J. I. Marín-Arrese (Ed.), Evidential marking in european languages: toward a unitary comparative account, 171–233. Berlin: De Gruyter [Google Scholar]
- Dendale, P. & W. De Mulder. 1996. Déduction ou abduction: le cas de devoir inférentiel. In Zlatka Guentchéva (ed) 1996, L’énonciation médiatisée, 305–318. Louvain: Peeters. [Google Scholar]
- Dendale, P. & L. Tasmowski. 2001. Introduction: Evidentiality and related notions. Journal of’ Pragmat1cs 33: 339–348. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Dendale, P. & Ph. Kreutz. 2021. Certainement: adverbe épistémico-modal ou évidentiel? Le discours et la langue: revue de linguistique française et d’analyse du discours, 13/1: 49–76. [Google Scholar]
- Dendale, P. & J. Miecznikowski. 2023. On inferential evidentiality: Is ‘evidential’ inference abductive? In Carretero, M., J. I. Marin-Arrese, E. Dominguez Romero, V. Martín de la Rosa (Ed.), Evidentiality and Epistemic Modality, 17–72. Peter Lang. [Google Scholar]
- Desclés, J-P. 2016. A cognitive and conceptual approach to tense and aspect markers. In Guentchéva, Z., Aspectuality and Temporality, Descriptive and theoretical issues, 27–60. John Benjamins Company. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Desclés, J-P. 2018. Epistemic modality and evidentiality from an enunciative perspective. In Guentchéva, Z., Epistemic modalities in cross-linguistique perspective, and evidentiality, 383–401. John Benjamins Company. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Desclés, J-P. & Z. Guentchéva. 2015. Inference processes expressed by languages: deduction of a probable consequent vs. Abduction. In Viviane Arigne and Christiane Rocq-Migette (eds.), Theorization and Representations in Linguistics, 241–265. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. [Google Scholar]
- Desclés, J-P. G. Guibert & B. Sauzay. 2016. Calculs de significations par une logique d’opérateurs. Toulouse: Cépadues. [Google Scholar]
- Desclés, J-P. & A. Pascu. 2022. Quasi-Topological Structure of Extensions Within Logic of Typicals ans Atypicals –LTA). In J.-Y. Beziou, J.-P. Desclés, A. Moktefi, A. Pascu (Ed.), Logic in Question, 611–656. Birkhäuser. [Google Scholar]
- Desclés, J-P. & A. Vinzerich. 2008. Epistemic Modalities and Temporal Reference Framesb International Congress of Linguistics, CIL XVIII July 24, 2008, Séoul: Korea University. [Google Scholar]
- Deutscher, G. 2002. On the misuse of the notion of ‘abduction’ in linguistics. Journal of Linguistics 38(03):469-485 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Floyd, S, E. Norcliffe & L. San Roque (eds). 2018. Egophoricity, Vol. 118. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Friedman, V. 1986. Evidentiality in the Balkans: Bulgarian, Macedonian, and Albanian. In W. Chafe & J. Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, 168–181. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation. [Google Scholar]
- Friedman, V. 2000. Confirmative/nonconfirmative in Balkan Slavic, Balkan Romance, and Albanian with additional observations on Turkish, Romani, Georgian and Lak, in Lars Johanson & Bo Utas (eds.), 329–366. [Google Scholar]
- Guentchéva, Z. (ed). 1996, L’énonciation médiatisée. Louvain: Peeters. [Google Scholar]
- Guilbaud, G. Th. 1985. Leçons d’à peu près. Paris: Christian Bourgeois éditeur [Google Scholar]
- Hagège, C. 1974. Les noms logophoriques, BSL, 69/1: 287–310. [Google Scholar]
- Hagège, C. 1986. La structure des langues. QSJ? Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. [Google Scholar]
- Hagège, C. 1995. Le rôle des médiaphoriques dans la langue et dans le discours. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris, t. XC/1: 1–19. [Google Scholar]
- Holvoet, A. 2018. Epistemic modality, evidentiality, quatativity and echic use. In Guentchéva, Z., Epistemic modalities in cross-linguistique perspective, and evidentiality, 242–258. John Benjamins Company [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Ifantidou, E. 2001. Evidentials and relevance. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Johanson, L. 2000. Turkic indirectives. In Lars Johanson & Bo Utas (eds.), Evidentials:Turkic, Iranian and neighbouring languages, 61–87. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. [Google Scholar]
- Johanson, L. & Bo Utas (eds.). 2000. Evidentials:Turkic, Iranian and neighbouring languages. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Kronning, H. 1966. Modalité, cognition et polysémie: sémantique du verbe modal devoir. Uppsala:Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, D. D. 1938. Conceptual Implications of an Indian Language, Philosophy of Science 5, 89–102. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Nichols, J. 2011. Ingush Grammar. Berkeley,Los Angeles, London: University of California Press (https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3nn7z6w5) [Google Scholar]
- Nuyts, J. 2001, Epistemic Modality, Language and Conceptualization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Palmer, F. R., 1986. Mood and Modality (1st edition). Cambridge University Press [Google Scholar]
- Palmer, F. R., 2001, Mood and Modality (2nd edition). Cambridge University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Papafragou, Anna. 2000. Modality: Issues in the semantics-pragmatics interface. Oxford: Elsevier. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Pauliny, E. 1967 [1948]. La phrase eet l’énonciation. Recueil Linguistique de Bratislava I, 59–66; repris dans Vashek, J. A Prague School Reader in Linguistiqcs, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 391–397. [Google Scholar]
- Peirce, Ch. S. 1966. The collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce [1839–1914] (8 vols.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Pólya, G. 1958. Les mathématiques et le raisonnement “plausible” (traduction française). Paris: Editions Jacques Gabay. [Google Scholar]
- Pottier, B. 2000, Représentations mentales et catégorisations linguistiques, Louvain-Paris: Editions Peeters. [Google Scholar]
- Pottier, B. 2012, Images et modèles en Sémantique, Paris: Honoré Champion. [Google Scholar]
- Simon, C. 2021. La catégorie égophorique dans les langues de l’Amdo (Tibet). Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris, 116/1: 281–326. [Google Scholar]
- Van der Auwera, J. & Vl. Plungian. 1998. Modality’s semantic map, Linguistic Typology 2: 79–124. [Google Scholar]
- Vinzerich, A. 2007. Étude linguistique sur les modalités aléthiques et épistémiques. Thèse de doctorat, Université de Paris-Sorbonne. [Google Scholar]
- Wiemer, B. 2018. Evidentials and epistemic modality, in Alexandra Y. Aikheinvald (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality, 85–108. Oxford: University Press . [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Willett, Th. 1988. A cross-linguistic survey of the grammaticization of evidentiality. Studies in Language 12(1): 51–97. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]