Open Access
Numéro |
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 191, 2024
9e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française
|
|
---|---|---|
Numéro d'article | 02009 | |
Nombre de pages | 13 | |
Section | Francophonie | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202419102009 | |
Publié en ligne | 28 juin 2024 |
- Ågren, J. (1973). Étude sur quelques liaisons facultatives dans le français de conversation radiophonique: Fréquences et facteurs. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. [Google Scholar]
- Barbiers, S. (2009). Locus and limits of syntactic microvariation. Lingua, 119, 1607–1623. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Barbiers, S. et Cornips, L. (2002). Introduction to syntactic microvariation. In: S. Barbiers, L. Cornips et S. van der Kleij (éds.), Syntactic Microvariation, Amsterdam: Meertens Instituut, 2–12. [Google Scholar]
- Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B et Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Beck, S. et al. (2009). Crosslinguistic variation in comparison constructions. Linguistic Variation Yearbook, 9. [Google Scholar]
- Beltrama, A. (2020). Social meaning in semantics and pragmatics. Language and Linguistics Compass, 14, e12398. [Google Scholar]
- Boersma, P. et Weenink, D. (2023). Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Logiciel]. http://www.praat.org/ [Google Scholar]
- Boltanski, L. et Thévenot, L. (1991). De la justification: les économies de la grandeur. Paris: Seuil. [Google Scholar]
- Bourdieu, P. et Boltanski, L. (1975). Le fétichisme de la langue. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 1, 2–32. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Brandner, E. (2012). Syntactic microvariation. Language and Linguistics Compass, 6(2), 113–130. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Burnett, H. (2012). The role of microvariation in the study of semantic universals: adverbial quantifiers in European and Québec French. Journal of Semantics, 29, 1–38. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Campbell-Kibler, K. (2007). Accent, (ING), and the social logic of listener perceptions. American Speech, 82, 32–64. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Chierchia, G. (1998). Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics, 6, 339–405. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Coquillon, A. et Turcsan, G. (2012). An overview of the phonological and phonetic properties of Southern French: Data from two Marseille surveys. In R. Gess, et al. (éds.), Phonological Variation in French: Illustrations from Three Continents, Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 105–27. [Google Scholar]
- Côté, M.-H. (2011). French liaison. In: M. van Oostendorp, C. Ewen, E. Hume et K. Rice (éds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology, Malden (Massachusetts): Wiley-Blackwell, 2685–2710. [Google Scholar]
- Côté, M.-H. (2017). La liaison en diatopie: esquisse d’une typologie. Journal of French Language Studies, 27, 13–25. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Doetjes, J. (2008). Adjectives and degree modification. In: L. McNally et C. Kennedy (éds.), Adjectives and Adverbs: Syntax, Semantics, and Discourse, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 123–155. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Dresher, B. E. (2013). Contrastive features and microvariation in vowel harmony. In: NELS 42: Proceedings of the forty-second annual meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, University of Toronto (vol. 1, pp. 141–153). [Google Scholar]
- Durand, J., Laks, B., Calderone, B. et Tchobanov, A. (2011). Que savons-nous de la liaison aujourd’hui? Langue Française, 169, 103–135. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Eckert, P. (2008). Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 12, 453–476. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Encrevé, P. (1988). La liaison avec et sans enchaînement: phonologie tridimensionnelle et usages du français. Paris: Seuil. [Google Scholar]
- Fougeron, C., Goldman, J.-P., Dart, A., Guélat, L. et Jeager, C. (2001). Influence de facteurs stylistiques, syntaxiques et lexicaux sur la réalisation de la liaison en français. In: Proceedings of TALN 2001, 173–182. [Google Scholar]
- Hale, M., Kissock, M. et Reiss, C. (2007). Microvariation, variation, and the features of universal grammar. Lingua, 117(4), 645–665. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Henry, A. (1995). Belfast English and Standard English: Dialect Variation and Parameter Setting. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Hornsby, David (2019). Variable liaison, diglossia, and the style dimension in spoken French. French Studies, 73, 578–597. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Hornsby, D. (2020). Norm and ideology in spoken French: A sociolinguistic history of liaison. Londres: Palgrave Macmillan. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Kayne, R. (1996). Microparametric syntax: Some introductory remarks. In: J. R. Black et C. Motapanyane (éds.), Microparametric Syntax and Dialect Variation, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, ix–xxviii. [Google Scholar]
- Kayne, R. (2000). Parameters and Universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Krifka, M. (1995). Common nouns: A contrastive analysis of English and Chinese. In: G. N. Carlson et F. J. Pelletier (éds.), The Generic Book, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 398–411. [Google Scholar]
- Labov, W. (1966). The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics. [Google Scholar]
- Lambert, W. E., Hodgson, R. C., Gardner, R. C. et Fillenbaum, S. (1960). Evaluational reactions to spoken languages. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 60, 44–51. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lamont, M. et L. Thévenot. (2000). Rethinking comparative cultural sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Martin, A., Abbou, J. et Burnett, H. (2023). Indexicalité et interprétation du monde social: une analyse socio-pragmatique de la liaison variable. Langue française, 219, 121–135. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Matthewson, L. (2001). Quantification and the nature of cross-linguistic variation. Natural Language Semantics, 9, 145–189. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Mayol, L. et Castroviejo, E. (2013). (Non)integrated evaluative adverbs in questions: A cross-Romance study. Language, 89, 195–230. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Ochs, E. (1992). Indexing gender. In: A. Duranti et C. Goodwin (éds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 335–358. [Google Scholar]
- Podesva, R. (2011). The California Vowel Shift and gay identity. American Speech, 86, 32–51. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Pustka, E. (2017). L’écrit avant l’écriture: la liaison dans les livres audio pour les enfants. Journal of French Language Studies, 27, 187–214. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Roberge, Y. et Vinet, M.-T. (1989). La variation dialectale en grammaire universelle. Montréal: Presses de l’Université de Montréal. [Google Scholar]
- Savoia, L. M. et Carpitelli, E. (2008). Problems in phonological micro-variation in dialects of Northern Italy. Revue française de linguistique appliquée, 2, 103–119. [Google Scholar]
- Silverstein, M. (2003). Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language & Communication, 23, 193–229. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Solt, S. et C. Umbach. (2017). Microvariation in Semantics, un évènement satellite du congrès Sinn und Bedeutung 22. https://microsem.wordpress.com/ [Google Scholar]
- Tagliamonte, S. (2013). Comparative sociolinguistics. In J. K. Chambers et N. Schilling (éds.), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, Hoboken (New Jersey): Wiley, 128–156. [Google Scholar]
- Woolard, K. (1985). Language variation and cultural hegemony: Towards an integration of sociolinguistic and social theory. American Ethnologist, 12, 738–748. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Woolard, K.B. et Schieffelin (1994). Language ideology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 23, 55–82. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]