La productivité syntaxique à l’aune de la sémantique distributionnelle | Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française

Open Access

Numéro		SHS Web Conf. Volume 191, 2024 9^e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française


Numéro d'article		00003
Nombre de pages		23
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202419100003
Publié en ligne		28 juin 2024

Aurnague, M. & Plenat, M. (1997), Manifestations morphologiques de la relation d’attachement habituel. Silexicales, 1. Mots possibles et mots existants, Corbin, D. Fradin, B., Habert, B. Kerleroux, F. & Plénat, M. éds. Lille: Université de Lille 3: 15–24. [Google Scholar]
Baayen, R. H. (1992), Quantitative aspects of morphological productivity. Yearbook of Morphology 1991, Booij, G. E. & van Marle, J. éds. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers: 109–149. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Baayen, R.H. (1993), On frequency, transparency, and productivity. Yearbook of Morphology 1991, Booij, G. E. & van Marle, J. éds. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers: 181–208. [Google Scholar]
Baayen, R. H. (2009), Corpus linguistics in morphology: morphological productivity. Corpus Linguistics. An international handbook, Lüdeling, A.& Kyto, M. éds, Berlin: De Gruyter: 900–919. [Google Scholar]
Baayen, R. H., et Renouf, A. (1996), Chronicling The Times: Productive Lexical Innovations in an English Newspaper. Language, 72: 69–96. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Barðdal, J. (2008), Productivity: Evidence from Case and Argument Structure in Icelandic. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Barðdal, J., Enghels, R., Feltgen, Q., Van Hulle, S. & Lauwers, P. (sous presse), Productivity in Diachrony. Wiley Blackwell Companion to Diachronic Linguistics, Ledgeway A., Breitbarth A., Kiss, K., Salmons J. & Simonenko A. éds. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell. [Google Scholar]
Benoit, K., Watanabe, K., Wang, H., Nulty, P., Obeng, A., Müller, S., & Matsuo, A. (2018), Quanteda: An R package for the quantitative analysis of textual data. Journal of Open Source Software, 3(30), 774. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Bolinger, D. (1972), Degree words. The Hague: Mouton. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Booj, G. (2010), Construction morphology. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3(1): 1–13. [Google Scholar]
Bybee, J. (1995). Regular morphology and the lexicon, Language and Cognitive Processes, 10(5): 425–455. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Bybee, J. (2006). Frequency of use and the organization of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
Bybee, J. & Eddington, D. (2006), A usage-based approach to Spanish verbs of ‘becoming’. Language, 82(2): 323–355. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Chomsky, N. (1965), Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. [Google Scholar]
Corbin, D. (1987), Morphologie dérivationnelle et structuration du lexique (2 vols). Tubingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. [Google Scholar]
Dal, G. (2003), Productivité morphologique: définitions et notions connexes. Langue française, 140: 3–23. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Desagulier, G. (2016), A lesson from associative learning: Asymmetry and productivity in multiple-slot constructions. Corpus linguistics and linguistic theory, 12(2): 173–219. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Devlin, J., Chang M.W., Lee K. & Toutanova K. (2019), BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1. Minneapolis, Minnesota: Association for Computational Linguistics: 4171–4186. [Google Scholar]
Erk, K. (2012), Vector space models of word meaning and phrase meaning: a survey. Language and Linguistics Compass 6(10): 635–653. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Evert, S. (2014), Distributional Semantics in R with the wordspace Package. Proceedings of COLING 2014, the 25th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations, Dublin: 110-114. [Google Scholar]
Feltgen, Q. (2017), Statistical physics of language evolution: the grammaticalization phenomenon. Paris: Université Paris sciences et lettres dissertation. Feltgen, Q. (s.p.p.), Testing diachronic measures of productivity using Zipf-Mandelbrot law. Qualico (12^th International Quantitative Linguistics Conference). [Google Scholar]
Firth, J.R. (1957), A synopsis of linguistic theory 1930–1955. Studies in Linguistic Analysis. Oxford: Philological Society: 1–32. [Google Scholar]
Gaeta, L. & Ricca, D. (2006), Productivity in Italian word formation: a variable-corpus approach. Linguistics, 44(1): 57–89. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Goldberg, A. (1995), Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar]
Goldberg, A. (2019). Explain me this. Creativity, competition, and the partial productivity of constructions. Princeton: Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar]
Grabar, N., Tribout D., Dal G., Fradin B., Hathout N., Lignon S., Namer F., Plancq C., Yvon F., Zweigenbaum P. (2006). Productivité quantitative des suffixations par -ité et -Able dans un corpus journalistique moderne. Verbum ex machina, Actes de la 13e conférence sur le traitement automatique des langues naturelles, Mertens P., Fairon, C., Dister, A. & Watrin P. éds. Louvain-la Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain: 167–177. [Google Scholar]
Gries, S. (2010). Useful statistics for corpus linguistics, A mosaic of corpus linguistics: selected approaches, Sánchez A. & Almela M. éds. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang: 269–291. [Google Scholar]
Gries, S. (2015), More (old and new) misunderstandings of collostructional analysis: On Schmid and Küchenhoff (2013). Cognitive Linguistics, 26 (3): 505–536. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Heylen, K., Wielfaert, T., Speelman, D. & Geeraerts, D. (2015), Monitoring polysemy: Word space models as a tool for large-scale lexical semantic analysis. Lingua, 157: 153–172. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Hoeksema, J. (2002), Minimaliseerders in het Standaardnederlands. Tabu, 32: 105–174. [Google Scholar]
Jackendoff, R., & Audring, J. (2019), The texture of the lexicon. Relational Morphology and the Parallel Architecture. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
Joubarne, C. & Inkpen, D.. 2011, Comparison of Semantic Similarity for Different Languages Using the Google n-gram Corpus and Second-Order Co-occurrence Measures. Advances in Artificial Intelligence . Canadian AI 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6657, Butz, C. & Lingras, P. éds. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer: 216–221. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Jurafsky D. & Martin J.H. (2024), Chapter 6: Vector semantics and embeddings. Speech and Language Processing (3^e éd.). Publication en ligne: https://web.stanford.edu/~jurafsky/slp3/6.pdf. [Google Scholar]
Kassambara, A. & Mundt, F. (2020), Factoextra: Extract and visualize the results of Multivariate Data Analyses. R package version 1.0.7. [Google Scholar]
Kassambara, A. (2017). Practical guide to principal component methods in R: PCA, M(CA), FAMD, MFA, HCPC, factoextra. STHDA. [Google Scholar]
Kruskal, J. B. (1964). Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis. Psychometrika, 29(1): 1–27. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Langacker, R. (1987), Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Volume I: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press. [Google Scholar]
Lauwers, P. (2014), From lexicalization to constructional generalizations. On complex prepositions in French. In: Romance Construction Grammar, Gonzálvez-García, F. & Boas, H. éds. Amsterdam etc.: Benjamins: 79–111. [Google Scholar]
Lauwers, P., & Van den Heede, M. (en préparation), Productivity and semantic diversity within a family of minimizing constructions in French. [Google Scholar]
Le H., Vial L., Frej J., Segonne, V., Coavoux M., Lecouteux, B., Allauzen A., Crabbe B., Besacier L. & Schwab, D. (2020). FlauBERT: Unsupervised language model pre-training for French ». Marseille: LREC. [Google Scholar]
Lê, S., Josse, J., & Husson, F. (2008), FactoMineR: An R Package for Multivariate Analysis. Journal of Statistical Software, 25(1): 1–18. [Google Scholar]
Mandera, P., Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2017), Explaining human performance in psycholinguistic tasks with models of semantic similarity based on prediction and counting: A review and empirical validation. Journal of Memory and Language, 92: 57-78. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Martin L., Muller, B., Ortiz Suárez, P.J., Dupont, Y., Romary L., de la Clergerie E., Seddah D. & Sagot B. (2020), CamemBERT: a tasty French language model. Proceedings of the 58^th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Association for Computational Linguistics: 7203–7219. [Google Scholar]
Nyrop, K. (1908), Grammaire historique de la langue française, tome 3. Copenhague: Gyldendalske Boghandel Nordisk Forlag; Leipzig/New York/Paris: Harrassowitz, Stechert & Picard. [Google Scholar]
Perek F. (2020), Productivity and Schematicity in constructional change. Nodes and Networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar, Sommerer, L. & Smirnova, E. éds, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins: 141–166. [Google Scholar]
Perek, F. (2016), Using distributional semantics to study syntactic productivity in diachrony: A case study. Linguistics, 54: 149–188. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Pinker, S. (1999), Words and Rules: The Ingredients of Language. London: Phoenix. [Google Scholar]
Plevoets, K. (2015), svs: Tools for Semantic Vector Spaces. Gent: Ghent University. [Google Scholar]
Pankratz, E., von der Malsburg, T. & Vasishth, S. (2022), Shannon entropy is a more comprehensive and principled morphological productivity measure than the standard alternatives. PsyArXiv, 8, juin 2022 (en ligne). [Google Scholar]
Suttle, L., & Goldberg, A. (2011), The partial productivity of constructions as induction. Linguistics, 49(6), 1237–1269. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Trousdale, G. (2008), A constructional approach to lexicalization processes in the history of English: evidence from possessive constructions. Word Structure, 1: 156–177. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Van den Heede, M. (en préparation), The minimizing construction in Dutch and French, Thèse de doctorat. Université de Gand. [Google Scholar]
Van den Heede, M., & Lauwers, P. (2023), Syntactic productivity under the microscope: the lexical and semantic openness of Dutch minimizing constructions. Folia Linguistica, 57(3): 723–761. [Google Scholar]
Van Hulle, S., Enghels, R. & Lauwers, P. (soumis pour publication), The many guises of productivity: a case-study of Spanish inchoative constructions. [Google Scholar]
Van Wettere, N. (2018), Copularité et Productivité: une analyse contrastive des verbes attributifs issus de verbes de mouvement en français et en néerlandais. Thèse de doctorat. Université de Gand. [Google Scholar]
Van Wettere, N. (2021), Productivity of French and Dutch (semi-)copular constructions and the adverse impact of high token frequency. International Journal of Corpus linguistics, 26: 396–428. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Van Wettere, N. (2022), The hapax/type ratio. An indicator of minimally required sample size in productivity studies? International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 27(2): 166–190. [Google Scholar]
Venables, W. N. & Ripley, B.D. (2002), Modern applied statistics with S. Fourth edition. New York: Springer [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Wickham, H. (2016), ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. New York: Springer. [Google Scholar]
Zeldes, A. (2012), Productivity in Argument Selection: From Morphology to Syntax. Berlin: De Gruyter. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Schäfer, R. (2015). Processing and querying large web corpora with the COW14 architecture. Proceedings of challenges in the management of large corpora (CMLC-3), IDS publication server: 28–34. [Google Scholar]
Schäfer, R. & Bildhauer, F. (2012), Building large corpora from the web using a new efficient tool chain. Proceedings of the eighth international conference on language resources and evaluation (LREC’ 12): 486–493. [Google Scholar]
Jakubíček, M., Kilgarriff A., Kovář V., Rychlý, P. & Suchomel, V. (2013). The TenTen corpus family. 7^th International Corpus Linguistics Conference CL. Lancaster: 125–127. [Google Scholar]
New, B. Lexique (http://www.lexique.org/) [Google Scholar]