L’âge avancé en perspective longitudinale et ses outils : LangAge, un corpus au pluriel | Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française

Open Access

Numéro		SHS Web Conf. Volume 138, 2022 8^e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française


Numéro d'article		10003
Nombre de pages		14
Section		Ressources et outils pour l’analyse linguistique
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202213810003
Publié en ligne		11 mai 2022

accès au corpus: http://www.langage-corpora.org [Google Scholar]
LaBB-CAT = Fromont, R. (2012–2021). LaBB-CAT: Language, Brain & Behaviour Corpus Analysis Tool. University of Canterbury (NZ): New Zealand Institute of Language, Brain and Behaviour. https://labbcat.canterbury.ac.nz/system/ (01.12.2021) [Google Scholar]
Abouda, L. & M. Skrovec. (2018). Pour une micro-diachronie de l’oral: le corpus ESLO-MD. Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française 6. art. 11004 [1-11]. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20184611004. [Google Scholar]
Ash, S. (2013). Social Class. In J. K. Chambers & N. Schilling-Estes (eds.), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, 350–367. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Baude, O. & C. Dugua. (2011). (Re)faire le corpus d’Orléans quarante ans après: ‘quoi de neuf, linguiste?’. Corpus 10. 99–118. https://doi.org/10.4000/corpus.203610.4000/corpus.2036. Bergounioux, G. (2010). Mai 68 vu d’Orléans: la geste et la parole. Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française 2. 1859–1875.https://doi.org/10.1051/cmlf/2010104. [Google Scholar]
Bergounioux, G., J. Baraduc & C. Dumont. (1992). L’Etude Socio-Linguistique sur Orléans (1966–1991): 25 ans d’histoire d’un corpus. Langue française 1. 74–93. https://doi.org/10.3406/lfr.1992.5812. [Google Scholar]
Biggs, P. & M. Dalwood. (1978). Les Orléanais ont la parole. München: Langenscheidt-Hachette. [Google Scholar]
Boersma, P. & D. Weenink. [2021]. Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer. PRAAT. http://www.praat.org. [Google Scholar]
Buchstaller, I. & S. E. Wagner. (2017). Introduction: Using Panel Data in the Sociolinguistic Study of Variation and Change. In S. E. Wagner & I. Buchstaller (eds.), Panel Studies of Variation and Change, 1–18. New York: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
ESLO = Laboratoire Ligérien de Linguistique. (2014). Enquêtes SocioLinguistiques à Orléans ; ESLO1: Corpus linguistique 1968–1974; ESLO2: 2008–2014. Université d’Orléans: LLL. http://eslo.huma-num.fr/http://eslo.huma-num.fr/ [Google Scholar]
FAIR = GO FAIR International Support and Coordination Office. (2021). FAIR Principles. Leiden (NL), Paris (F), Hamburg (D): GO FAIR. https://www.go-fair.org/fair-principles/ (01.12.2021) [Google Scholar]
Flamein, H. & I. Eshkol-Taravella. (2021). Exploitation du corpus Enquêtes sociolinguistiques à Orléans (ESLO) par les outils du traitement automatique des langues et de la géomatique. Humanités numériques 3. https://doi.org/10.4000/revuehn.1911. [Google Scholar]
Frankenberg, C., J. Weiner, M. Knebel, A. Abulimiti, P. Toro, C. J. Herold, T. Schultz & J. Schröder. (2021). Verbal fluency in normal aging and cognitive decline: Results of a longitudinal study. Computer Speech & Language 68. 101195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csl.2021.101195. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Fromont, R. (2019). Forced Alignment of Different Language Varieties using LaBB-CAT. Inter-national Congress of Phonetic Sciences 2019. https://www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphsproceedings/ICPhS2019/papers/ICPhS_1376.pdf [Google Scholar]
Fromont, R. & J. Hay. (2012). LaBB-CAT: an Annotation Store. In P. Cook & S. Nowson (eds.), Proceedings of Australasian Language Technology Association Workshop 2012, 113–117. Dunedin (NZ): Otago University. https://aclanthology.org/U12-1015.pdf (01.12.2021). [Google Scholar]
Fuchs, S., L. L. Koenig & A. Gerstenberg. (2021). A Longitudinal Study of Speech Acoustics in Older French Females: Analysis of the Filler Particle euh across Utterance Positions. Languages 6(4). 211. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages6040211. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Gerstenberg, A. (2011). Generation und Sprachprofile im höheren Lebensalter: Untersuchungen zum Französischen auf der Basis eines Korpus biographischer Interviews. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann. [Google Scholar]
Gerstenberg, A. (2015). A Sociolinguistic Perspective on Vocabulary Richness in a Seven-Year Comparison of Older Adults. In A. Gerstenberg & A. Voeste (eds.), Language Development: the Lifespan Perspective, 109–127. Amsterdam: Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.37.06ger. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Gerstenberg, Annette, Valerie Hekkel & Julie Kairet. 2018. Corpus LangAge: Transcription Guide. University of Potsdam: Department of Romance Studies. doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6444538. [Google Scholar]
Gerstenberg, A. & H. E. Hamilton. (2022). Older adults’ conversations and the emergence of ‘narrative crystals’: A new approach to frequently told stories. Narrative Inquiry. https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.21075.ger. 1–34. [Google Scholar]
Gerstenberg, A. & J. Kairet. (2021). Prosodic Features and Situational Settings: Doing Reading Aloud in a French Writing Class. In A. Teixeira Kalkhoff, M. Selig & C. Mooshammer (eds.), Prosody and Conceptional Variation, 141–156. Frankfurt am Main: Lang. [Google Scholar]
Gerstorf, D., G. Hülür, J. Drewelies, P. Eibich, S. Duezel, I. Demuth, P. Ghisletta, E. Steinhagen-Thiessen, G. G. Wagner & U. Lindenberger. (2015). Secular changes in late-life cognition and well-being: Towards a long bright future with a short brisk ending? Psychology and Aging 30(2). 301–310. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000016. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Grice, H. P. 1975. Logic and conversation. In: P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics. Vol. 3: Speech acts, 41–58. New York: Academic Press. [Google Scholar]
Hekkel, V. (2021). Eine soziolinguistische Betrachtung von parce que-Strukturen in Synchronie und Diachronie. Universität Potsdam: publishUP. https://doi.org/10.25932/publishup-51396. [Google Scholar]
Higman, R., D. Bangert & S. Jones. (2019). Three camps, one destination: the intersections of research data management, FAIR and Open. Insights 32(18). 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.468. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Hirst, D. (2013). Anonymising Long Sounds for Prosodic Research. In B. Bigi & D. Hirst (eds.), Tools and Resources for the Analysis of Speech Prosody. TRASP 2013, 36–37. Aix-en-Provence: Laboratoire Parole et Langage. http://www2.lpl-aix.fr/~trasp/Proceedings/19906-trasp2013.pdf (01.12.2021) [Google Scholar]
INA (ed.). 1969. Affaire classée? – Un reportage de Jacques et Maurice Gugowson ; Pierre André [Documentation vidéo de 1969, publié le 29.03.2019, mis à jour le 08.07.2021]. Paris: Institut national de l’audiovisuel. https://www.ina.fr/contenus-editoriaux/articles-editoriaux/1969-larumeur-d-orleans-un-retour-au-moyen-age/ (01.12.2021). [Google Scholar]
Krause, T. & A. Zeldes. (2016). ANNIS3: A new architecture for generic corpus query and visualization. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 31(1). 118–139. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Kairet, J. (2019). Silent Pause Duration and Distribution in Older Womens’ Speech: a Case Study with 4 Within-speaker Comparison. In O. Niebuhr, J. Neitsch, S. Berger, K. Fischer, J. Michalsky, S. Eisenberger & M. Jelínek (eds.), Proceedings of the 1st International Seminar on the Foundations of Speech – Pausing, Breathing and Voice. University of Southern Denmark, Sønderborg, Denmark, December 1–3, 2019, vol. 1, 61–63. Sønderborg: University of Southern Denmark. [Google Scholar]
Labov, W. & J. Auger. 1993. The Effect of Normal Aging on Discourse: A Sociolinguistic Approach. In H. H. Brownell & Y. Joanette (eds.) Narrative Discourse in Neurologically Impaired and Normal Aging Adults, 115–133. San Diego (CA): Singular. [Google Scholar]
Lonergan, J., J. Kay & J. Ross. (1974). Étude sociolinguistique sur Orléans. Catalogue d’enregistrements. Colchester: Typoscript. [Google Scholar]
Luo, M., M. Neysari, G. Schneider, M. Martin & B. Demiray. (2020). Linear and Non-Linear Age Trajectories of Language Use: A Laboratory Observation Study of Couples’ Conflict Conversations. The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbaa041. [Google Scholar]
Messer, R. H. 2015. Pragmatic Language Changes During Normal Aging: Implications for Health Care. Healthy Aging & Clinical Care in the Elderly 7. 1–7. https://doi.org/10.4137/HaCCe.S22981. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Milroy, L. & M. J. Gordon. (2003). Sociolinguistics. Method and interpretation. Oxford: Blackwell. [Google Scholar]
Mullineaux, A. & M. Blanc. (1982). The Problem of Classifying the Population Sample in the Sociolinguistic Survey of Orleans (1969) in Terms of Socio-Economic, Social and Educational Categories. ITL – International Journal of Applied Linguistics (55). 3–37. https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.55.01mul. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Pagenstecher, C. (2020). Oral-History.Digital – Interviewsammlungen als Forschungsdaten. Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin. [Google Scholar]
Pichler, H., S. E. Wagner & A. Hesson. (2018). Old-age Language Variation and Change: Confronting Variationist Ageism. Language and Linguistics Compass 12(6)., 1–21. 10.1111/lnc3.12281. [Google Scholar]
Pope, C. & B. H. Davis. (2011). Finding a Balance: The Carolinas Conversation Collection. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 7(1). 546. https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt.2011.007. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Sankoff, G. 2017. Before There Were Corpora. In S. Wagner & I. Buchstaller (eds.), Panel Studies of Variation and Change, 21–51. New York: Routledge. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Schmidt, T. & K. Wörner. (2014). EXMARaLDA. In J. Durand, U. Gut & G. Kristoffersen (eds.), The Oxford handbook of corpus phonology (Oxford handbooks in linguistics), 402–419. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199571932.013.030. [Google Scholar]
Sillars, A. L. & P. H. Zietlow. (1993). Investigations of Marital Communication and Lifespan Development. In N. Coupland & J. Nussbaum (eds.), Discourse and Lifespan Identity, 237–261. Newbury Park (CA): SAGE. [Google Scholar]
Slembrouck, S. (2015). The Role of the Researcher in Interview Narrative. In: A. De Fina & A. Georgakopoulou (eds.), The Handbook of Narrative Analysis, 237–254. Oxford: Blackwell. [Google Scholar]
Specht, J., W. Bleidorn, J. J. Denissen, M. Hennecke, R. Huttemann, C. Kandler, M. Luhmann, U. Orth, A. K. Reitz, J. Zimmermann, J. J. A. Denissen & R. Hutteman. (2014). What drives adult personality development? A comparison of theoretical perspectives and empirical evidence. European Journal of Personality 28(3). 216–230. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1966. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Synapse. (2008). Cordial Analyseur version 14.0. Paris: Synapse Développement. [Google Scholar]
TUSTEP. (2021). Tübinger System von Textverarbeitungs-Programmen. Tübingen: Universität Tübingen; Zentrum für Datenverarbeitung. [Google Scholar]
Wagner, S. E. & S. A. Tagliamonte. (2017). What Makes a Panel Study Work? Researcher and Participant in Real Time. In: S. Wagner & I. Buchstaller (eds.), Panel Studies of Variation and Change, 213–232. New York: Routledge. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]