Open Access
| Numéro |
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 138, 2022
8e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Numéro d'article | 01010 | |
| Nombre de pages | 15 | |
| Section | Discours, pragmatique et interaction | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202213801010 | |
| Publié en ligne | 11 mai 2022 | |
- Adorno, T.W. (1950). The Authoritarian personality. 1st edn. New York: Harper. [Google Scholar]
- Adorno, T.W. (1951). Minima Moralia. Reflexionen aus dem beschädigten Leben. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. [Google Scholar]
- Althusser, L. (1993). Écrits sur la psychanalyse. Freud et Lacan. Paris: Stock/Imec. [Google Scholar]
- Althusser, L. (1995). Sur la reproduction. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. [Google Scholar]
- Angermuller, J. (2013a). Analyse du discours poststructuraliste. Les voix du sujet dans le langage chez Lacan, Althusser, Foucault, Derrida et Sollers. Limoges: Lambert Lucas. [Google Scholar]
- Angermuller, J. (2013b). ‘How to become an academic philosopher. Academic discourse as a multileveled positioning practice’, Sociología histórica, 3, pp. 263–289. [Google Scholar]
- Angermuller, J. (2013c). Le Champ de la Théorie. Essor et déclin du structuralisme en France. Paris: Hermann. [Google Scholar]
- Angermuller, J. (2015). ‘Discourse Studies’, in Wright, J.D. (ed.) International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, Second Edition. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 510–515. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Angermuller, J. (2018). ‘Accumulating discursive capital, valuating subject positions. From Marx to Foucault’, Critical Discourse Studies, 15(4), pp. 415–425. [Google Scholar]
- Angermuller, J. (2020). in De Fina, A. and Georgakopolou, A. (eds) Poststructuralist Discourse Studies: from structure to practice. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, pp. 235–254. [Google Scholar]
- Ashmore, M. (1989). The Reflexive Thesis. Writing Sociology of Scientific Knowledge. Chicago: Chicago University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Authier-Revuz, J. (1982). ‘Hétérogénéité montrée et hétérogénéité constitutive. Éléments pour une approche de l’autre dans le discours’, DRLAV, 26, pp. 91–151. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Benveniste, É. (1966). Problèmes de linguistique générale, 1. Paris: Gallimard. [Google Scholar]
- Benveniste, É. (1974). Problèmes de linguistique générale, 2. Paris: Gallimard. [Google Scholar]
- Berrendonner, A. (1981). Eléments de pragmatique linguistique. Paris: Minuit. [Google Scholar]
- Boltanski, L. (2009). De la critique. Précis de sociologie de l’émancipation. Paris: Gallimard. [Google Scholar]
- Bühler, K. (1965). Sprachtheorie. Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer. [Google Scholar]
- Butler, J. (1993). Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of ‘Sex’. London: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
- Cap, P. (2008). ‘Towards the proximization model of the analysis of legitimization in political discourse’, Journal of Pragmatics, 40(1), pp. 17–41. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Charaudeau, P. (1997). Le Discours d’information médiatique. La construction du miroir social. Paris: Nathan. [Google Scholar]
- Chilton, P. (2017). ‘Toward a neuro-cognitive model of socio-political discourse, and an application to the populist [Google Scholar]
- discourse of Donald Trump’, Langage et societe, 160161(2), pp. 237–249. [Google Scholar]
- Conein, B. et al. (1981). Matérialités discursives, Actes du Colloque des 24-26 avril 1980, Paris X-Nanterre. Lille: Presses Universitaires de Lille. [Google Scholar]
- Culioli, A. (2002). Variations sur la linguistique. Entretiens avec Frédéric Fau. Paris: Klincksieck. [Google Scholar]
- Demata, M. (2020). ‘Populism and nationalism in Jeremy Corbyn’s discourse’, in Discursive Approaches to Populism across Disciplines. The Return of Populists and the People. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 253–283. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- van Dijk, T.A. (2008). Discourse and Context. A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Du Bois, J.W. (2007). ‘The stance triangle’, in Englebretson, R. (ed.) Pragmatics & Beyond New Series. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 139–182. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Ducrot, O. (1984). Le Dire et le dit. Paris: Minuit. [Google Scholar]
- Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power. London: Longman. [Google Scholar]
- Foucault, M. (1966). Les Mots et les choses. Une archéologie des sciences humaines. Paris: Gallimard. [Google Scholar]
- Foucault, M. (1969). L’Archéologie du savoir. Paris: Gallimard. [Google Scholar]
- Foucault, M. (2004). Territoire, population, sécurité. Paris: Gallimard, Seuil. [Google Scholar]
- Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. [Google Scholar]
- Grey, C. (2021). Brexit Unfolded: How no one got what they wanted (and why they were never going to). La Vergne: Biteback Publishing. [Google Scholar]
- Gumperz, J. (1982). Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Hall, S. et al. (1980). Culture, Media, Language. London: Hutchinson. [Google Scholar]
- Harré, R. and Davies, B. (1990). ‘Positioning: The Discursive Production of Selves’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20(1), pp. 43–63. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Henkel, I. (2021). Destructive storytelling: disinformation and the Eurosceptic myth that shaped brexit. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Hicks, D. and Potter, J. (1991). ‘Sociology of scientific knowledge. A reflexive citation analysis or Science disiplines and disciplining sciences’, Social Studies of Science, 21(3), pp. 459–501. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Jameson, F. (1991). Postmodernism, or The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Durham: Duke University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C. (1990). Les Interactions verbales. T I-III. Paris: Armand Colin. [Google Scholar]
- Knorr Cetina, K. (2009). ‘The Synthetic Situation: Interactionism for a Global World’, Symbolic Interaction, 32(1), pp. 61–87. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Koller, V., Kopf, S. and Miglbauer, M. (2019). Discourses of Brexit. 1st edn. Milton: Routledge. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Lacan, J. (1966). Écrits. Paris: Le Seuil. [Google Scholar]
- Lacan, J. (1978). Le moi dans la théorie de Freud et dans la technique de la psychanalyse. Le séminaire, Livre II. Paris: Le Seuil. [Google Scholar]
- Laclau, E. (1994). The Making of Political Identities. London: Verso. [Google Scholar]
- Laclau, E. (1996). Emancipation(s). London, New York: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
- Langacker, R.W. (2010). Grammar and Conceptualization, Grammar and Conceptualization. De Gruyter Mouton. [Google Scholar]
- Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Lyons, J. (1982). ‘Deixis and Subjectivity: Loquor, Ergo Sum?’, in Robert, J. and Klein, W. (eds) Speech, Place, and Action: Studies in Deixis and Related Topics. New York: Wiley, pp. 101–124. [Google Scholar]
- Maingueneau, D. (1987). Nouvelles Tendances en analyses du discours. Paris: Hachette. [Google Scholar]
- Maingueneau, D. and Cossutta, F. (1995). ‘L’analyse des discours constituants’, Langages, 117, pp. 112–125. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Mead, G.H. (1967). Mind, Self, & Society from the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Pêcheux, M. (1969). Analyse automatique du discours. Paris: Dunod. [Google Scholar]
- Pêcheux, M. (1975). Les Vérités de La Palice. Paris: Maspero. [Google Scholar]
- Rawlinson, F. (2020). How Press Propaganda Paved the Way to Brexit. 1st ed. 2019. Cham: Springer International Publishing AG. [Google Scholar]
- Récanati, F. (1987). Meaning and force: the pragmatics of performative utterances. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Rose, N. (1999). Powers of Freedom. Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Schegloff, E. (1997). ‘Whose Text? Whose Context?’, Discourse & Society, 8(2), pp. 165–187. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Sitri, F. (1996). ‘Interdiscours et construction de l’objet de discours’, Linx. Revue des linguistes de l’université Paris X Nanterre, (8), pp. 153–172. [Google Scholar]
- Sum, N.-L. and Jessop, B. (2013) Towards a Cultural Political Economy. Putting Culture in its Place in Political Economy. Cheltenham, Northampton: Edward Elgar. [Google Scholar]
- White, P. (2015). Appraisal Theory. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9781118611463.wbielsi041 (13 January 2022). [Google Scholar]
- Zappettini, F. and Krzyżanowski, M. (2019). ‘The critical juncture of Brexit in media & political discourses: from national-populist imaginary to cross-national social and political crisis’, Critical discourse studies, 16(4), pp. 381–388. doi:10.1080/17405904.2019.1592767. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Žižek, S. (1991). Looking Awry. An Introduction to Jacques Lacan through Popular Culture. Cambridge, MA, London: MIT Press. [Google Scholar]