Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 78, 2020
7e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française
Article Number 10001
Number of page(s) 10
Section Psycholinguistique et acquisition
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20207810001
Published online 4 septembre 2020
  • Arnold, J. E., Brown-Schmidt, S., & Trueswell, J. (2007). Children’s use of gender and order-of-mention during pronoun comprehension. Language and cognitive processes, 22(4),527-565. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Baayen, H., Davidson, D., &. Bates, D. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4). 390-412. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Barr, D., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3). 255-278. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1),1-48. [Google Scholar]
  • Baumann, P., Konieczny, L., & Hemforth, B. (2014). Conversational implicatures in anaphora resolution: Alternative constructions and referring expressions. In B. Hemforth, B., Schmiedtovà, & C. Fabricius-Hansen (Eds.), Psycholinguistic approaches to meaning and understanding across languages (pp. 197-212). Studies in theoretical psycholinguistics. Munich: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  • Colonna, S., Schimke, S., & Hemforth, B. (2014). Information structure and pronoun resolution in German and French: Evidence from the visual-world paradigm. In B. Hemforth, B., Schmiedtovà, & C. Fabricius-Hansen (Eds.), Psycholinguistic approaches to meaning and understanding across languages (pp. 175-195). Studies in theoretical psycholinguistics. Munich: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  • de la Fuente, I., Hemforth, B., Colonna, S., & Schimke, S. (2016). The role of syntax, semantics, and pragmatics in pronoun resolution: A cross-linguistic overview. In A. Holler & K. Suckow (Eds.), Experimental Perspectives on Anaphora Resolution, Linguistische Arbeiten 563 (pp. 11-31). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. [Google Scholar]
  • Dink J., & Ferguson, B. (2018). eyetrackingR. R package version 0.1.8, http://www.eyetracking-R.com. [Google Scholar]
  • Gerard, J., Lidz, J., Zuckerman, S., & Pinto, M. (2017). Similarity-Based Interference and the Acquisition of Adjunct Control. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1822. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01822 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gerard, J., Lidz, J., Zuckerman, S., & Pinto, M. (2018). The acquisition of adjunct control is colored by the task. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 3(1), 75. doi: 10.5334/gjgl.547 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hartshorne, J., Nappa, R., & Snedeker, J. (2014). Development of the First-Mention Bias. Journal of Child Language, 15, 1-24. [Google Scholar]
  • Hemforth, B., Konieczny, L., Scheepers, C., Colonna, S., Schimke, S., Baumann, P., & Pynte, J. (2010). Language specific preferences in anaphor resolution: Exposure or gricean maxims? In S. Ohlsson & R. Catarambone (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 2218-2223). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society. [Google Scholar]
  • Jaeger, F. (2011). More on random slopes and what it means if your effect is not longer significant after the inclusion of random slopes. Post to HLP/Jaeger lab blog. Consulté sur http://hlplab.wordpress.com/2011/06/25/more-on-random-slopes. [Google Scholar]
  • Jarvikivi, J., Pyykkonen, P., Schimke, S., Colonna, S., & Hemforth, B. (2014). Information structure cues for 4 year olds and adults: Tracking eye-movements to visually presented anaphoric referents. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29(7),877-892. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Léger, E. (2017). Interprétation des pronoms clitiques objets chez les enfants avec TSA et chez les enfants avec TSL. Etude comparative en suivi du regard. Thèse de doctorat, Université de Tours, France. [Google Scholar]
  • Pyykkonen, P., Matthews, D., & Jarvikivi, J. (2010). Three-year-olds are sensitive to semantic prominence during online language comprehension: A visual world study of pronoun resolution. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25, 115-129. doi: 10.1080/01690960902944014 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • R Core Team (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL http://www.R-project.org/. [Google Scholar]
  • Sekerina, I. A. (2015). Online evidence for children’s interpretation of personal pronouns. In L. Serratrice & S. E. Allen (Eds.), The acquisition of reference (pp. 213-239). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Schimke, S., de la Fuente, I., Hemforth, B., & Colonna S. (2018). First language influence on second language offline and online ambiguous pronoun resolution. Language Learning, 68(3),744-779. doi:10.1111/lang.12293 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Schulz, M., Burnett, H., & Hemforth, B. (2019). A Rational Speech Act model of cross-linguistic differences in pronoun resolution preferences. Poster presented at CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, Colorado Boulder. [Google Scholar]
  • Snedeker, J., & Trueswell J. (2004). The developing constraints on parsing decisions: The role of lexical-biases and referential scenes in child and adult sentence processing. Cognitive Psychology, 49(3),238-299. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Song, H., & Fisher, C. (2005). Who’s “she”? Discourse prominence influences preschoolers’ comprehension of pronouns. Journal ofMemory & Language, 52(1),29-57. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2004.06.012 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Song, H., & Fisher, C. (2007). Discourse prominence effects on 2.5-year-old children’s interpretation of pronouns. Lingua, 117, 1959-1987. doi: 10.1016/j. lingua.2006.11.011 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Tuller, L., Delage, H., Monjauze, C., Piller, A.-G., & Barthez, M.-A. (2011). Clitic pronoun production as a measure of atypical language development in French. Lingua, 121. DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2010.10.008 [Google Scholar]
  • van der Lely, H. K. J., & Stollwerck, L. (1997). Binding theory and grammatical specific language impairment in children. Cognition, 62(3), 245-290. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wang, C.-C., Vincent, C., Schimke, S., & Colonna, S. (2019). Interpretation strategies of anaphoric pronoun by second language learners. Manuscrit en préparation. [Google Scholar]
  • Wykes, T. (1983). The role of inferences in children’s comprehension of pronouns. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 35, 180-193. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]