Open Access
| Numéro |
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 46, 2018
6e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Numéro d'article | 14008 | |
| Nombre de pages | 15 | |
| Section | Syntaxe | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20184614008 | |
| Publié en ligne | 9 juillet 2018 | |
- Abeillé, A. & Barrier, N. (2004). Enriching a French treebank. In Proceedings of Language Ressources and Evaluation Conference (LREC), Lisbonne. [Google Scholar]
- Abeillé, A., Clément, L. & Toussenel, F. (2003). Building a treebank for French. In Treebanks. Dordrecht: Kluwer. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Abeillé, A. & Godard, D. (2004). De la légèreté en syntaxe. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris, XCIX(1), 69-106. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Abeillé, A. & Godard, D. (2006). La légèreté en français comme déficience de mobilité. Lingvisticae Investigationes, 29(1), 11–24. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Agresti, A. (2007). An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. Wiley. [Google Scholar]
- Ariel, M. (1990). Accessing Noun-Phrase Antecedents. London: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
- Arnold, J. E. (1998). Reference Form and Discourse Patterns. PhD thesis, Stanford University, Stanford. [Google Scholar]
- Arnold, J. E. (2010). How Speakers Refer: The Role of Accessibility. Language and Linguistics Compass, 4(4), 187–203. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Arnold, J. E., Wasow, T., Losongco, A. & Ginstrom, R. (2000). Heaviness vs. newness: The effects of structural complexity and discourse status on constituent ordering. Language, 76(1), 28–55. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Bates, D., Maechler, M. & Bolker, B. (2012). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using s4 classes. [Google Scholar]
- Behaghel, O. (1909). Von deutscher Wortstellung [de l’ordre des mots en allemand]. Indogermanische Forschungen, 25, 110–142. [Google Scholar]
- Berrendonner, A. (1987). L’ordre des mots et ses fonctions. Travaux de linguistique, 14/15, 9–19. [Google Scholar]
- Bijankhan, M. (2004). Naqsh-e peykare-hā-ye zabāni dar neveshtan-e dastur-e zabān: mo’areffi-ye yek narmafzār-e rāyāne-i [le rôle de corpus pour écrire une grammaire : présentation d’un logiciel]. Majalle-ye zabanshenāsi, 19(2), 48–67. [Google Scholar]
- Blinkenberg, A. (1928). L’ordre des mots en français moderne. Première partie. Copenhague: Høst & Søn. [Google Scholar]
- Bock, J. K. & Levelt, W. (1994). Language production: Grammatical encoding. In M. Gernsbacher, Ed., Handbook of psycholinguistics, p. 945–984. New York: Academic Press. [Google Scholar]
- Chafe, W. (1976). Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics and point of view. In C. N. Li, Ed., Subject and Topic, p. 27–55. New York: Academic Press. [Google Scholar]
- Chomsky, N. (1975). The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory. Cambridge: MIT Press. [Google Scholar]
- Clark, H. H. & Clark, E. V. (1977). Psychology and Language: An introduction to psycholinguistics. New York: Harcourt Press Jovanich. [Google Scholar]
- De Smedt, K. (1994). Parallelism in incremental sentence generation. In G. Adriaens & U. Hahn, Eds., Parallel natural language processing, p. 421–447. Norwood: Ablex. [Google Scholar]
- Drummond, A. (2013). Ibex farm. Version 0.3. [Google Scholar]
- Faghiri, P., Samvelian, P. & Hemforth, B. (2014). Accessibility and word order: The case of ditransitive constructions in Persian. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, p. 217–237. S. Müller. [Google Scholar]
- Gibson, E. (1998). Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition, 68, 1–76. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Gibson, E. (2000). The dependency locality theory: A distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. In Image, Language, Brain: Papers from the First Mind Articulation Project Symposium, p. 95–126. Cambridge: MIT Press. [Google Scholar]
- T. Givón, Ed. (1983). Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language study. Amsterdam et Philadelphie: John Benjamins. [Google Scholar]
- Grant, M., Abeillé, A., Crabbé, B. & Thuilier, J. (2014). The role of conceptual accessibility on word order alternations in french: Evidence from sentence recall. Poster présenté à International Workshop on Language Production 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Gundel, J. K. (1988). Universals of topic-comment structure. In M. Hammond, E. A. Moravcsik & J. R. Wirth, Eds., Studies in Syntactic Typology: John Benjamins. [Google Scholar]
- Gundel, J. K., Hedberg, N. & Zacharski, R. (1993). Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language, 69(2). [Google Scholar]
- Hawkins, J. (1994). A Performance Theory of Order and Constituency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Hawkins, J. (2004). Efficiency and Complexity in Grammars. Oxford University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Levelt, W. J. (1989). Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. ACL-MIT Press series in natural-language processing. Bradford Books. [Google Scholar]
- Prince, E. F. (1981). Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In P. Cole, Ed., Radical Pragmatics, p. 223–256. New York: Academic Press. [Google Scholar]
- Ross, J. R. (1967). Constraints on variables in syntax. PhD thesis, Department of Linguistics, MIT. [Google Scholar]
- Schmitt, C. (1987a). à propos de l’impact de la sémantique sur la séquence des compléments d’objets en français moderne. Travaux de linguistique et de littérature, 25(1), 283–298. [Google Scholar]
- Schmitt, C. (1987b). Sémantique et prédétermination de l’ordre des mots en français contemporain. Travaux de linguistique, 14/15, 21–31. [Google Scholar]
- Stallings, L. M. & MacDonald, M. C. (2011). It’s not Just the “Heavy NP”: Relative Phrase Length Modulates the Production of Heavy-NP Shift. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 40(3), 177–187. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Stallings, L. M., MacDonald, M. C. & O’Seaghdha, P. G. (1998). Phrasal ordering constraints in sentence production: Phrase length and verb disposition in heavy-NP shift. Journal of Memory and Language, 39(3), 392–417. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Thuilier, J. (2012a). Contraintes préférentielles et ordre des mots en français. PhD thesis, Université Paris Diderot. [Google Scholar]
- Thuilier, J. (2012b). Lemme verbal et classe sémantique dans l’ordonnancement des compléments postverbaux. In F. Neveu, V. Muni Toke, P. Blumenthal, T. Klingler, P. Ligas, S. Prévost & S. Teston-Bonnard, Eds., Actes du 3ème Congrés Mondial de Linguistique Française 2012 (CMLF 2012), p. 2451–2469. [Google Scholar]
- Thuilier, J., Abeillé, A. & Crabbé, B. (2014). Ordering preferences for postverbal complements in french. In Tyne, André, Benzitoun, Boulton & Greub, Eds., French through Corpora: Ecological and Data-driven Perspectives in French Language Studies, p. 77–102. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholar Publishing. [Google Scholar]
- Wasow, T. (1997). Remarks on grammatical weight. Language Variation and Change, 9, 81–105. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Wasow, T. (2002). Postverbal Behavior. CSLI publications. [Google Scholar]
- Wasow, T. & Arnold, J. (2005). Intuitions in linguistic argumentation. Lingua, 115(11), 1481–1496. [Google Scholar]
- Yamashita, H. & Chang, F. (2001). ’Long before short’ preferences in the production of a head final language. Cognition, 81(2). [Google Scholar]