Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 46, 2018
6e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française
Article Number 08006
Number of page(s) 15
Section Morphologie
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20184608006
Published online 9 juillet 2018
  • Balvet, A., Barque, L., Condette, M. H., Haas, P., Huyghe, R., Marin, R., & Merlo, A. (2011). La ressource Nomage. Confronter les attentes théoriques aux observations du comportement linguistique des nominalisations en corpus. Traitement Automatique des Langues, 52(3), 129-152. [Google Scholar]
  • Baroni, M. & Lenci, A. (2010). Distributional memory: A General Framework for Corpus-based Semantics. Computational Linguistics, 36, 673-721. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Baroni, M.; Bernardi, R. & Zamparelli, R. (2014). Frege in Space: A Program of Compositional Distributional Semantics. LiLT (Linguistic Issues in Language Technology), 9, 241-346. [Google Scholar]
  • Baroni, M. & Zamparelli, R. (2010). Nouns are Vectors, Adjectives are Matrices: Representing Adjective-noun Constructions in Semantic Space. In Proceedings of the 2010 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), Cambridge,1183-1193. [Google Scholar]
  • Bojanowski, P.; Grave, E.; Joulin, A. & Mikolov, T. (2016). Enriching Word Vectors with Subword Information. arXiv preprint arXiv:1607.04606. [Google Scholar]
  • Bolukbasi, T.; Chang, K.-W.; Zou, J. Y.; Saligrama, V. & Kalai, A. T. (2016). Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddings. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), Barcelone, 4349-4357. [Google Scholar]
  • Bonami, O. (2017). Predictability in Inflection and Word Formation. ParadigMo 2017: First Workshop on Paradigmatic Word Formation Modeling. [Google Scholar]
  • Bußmann, H., & Hellinger, M. (2003). Engendering Female Visibility in German. Gender across languages: The linguistic representation of women and men, 3, 141-174. [Google Scholar]
  • Chomsky, N. (1970). Remarks on Nominalization. In, R. Jakobs and P. Rosenbaum (Eds.), Readings in English Transformational Grammar, 184-221. [Google Scholar]
  • Dawes, E. (2003). La féminisation des titres et fonctions dans la Francophonie : de la morphologie à l’idéologie. Ethnologies, Association Canadienne d’Ethnologie et de Folklore, 25, 195-213. [Google Scholar]
  • Dubois, J. (1962). Étude sur la dérivation suffixale en français moderne et contemporain : essais d’interprétation des mouvements observés dans le domaine de la morphologie des mots construits. Paris : Larousse. [Google Scholar]
  • Fabre, C. & Lenci, A. (2015). Distributional Semantics Today – Introduction to the special issue. Traitement Automatique des Langues, 56(2), 7-20. [Google Scholar]
  • Firth, J. R. (1957). A Synopsis of Linguistic Theory 1930-1955. Studies in linguistic analysis, Basil Blackwell. [Google Scholar]
  • Fradin, B. (2014). La variante et le double. Foisonnements morphologiques. Études en hommage à Françoise Kerleroux, 109-147. [Google Scholar]
  • Grefenstette, G. (1994). Corpus-Derived First, Second and Third-Order Word Affinities. In Proceedings of the 6th International Congress on Lexicography (EURALEX), Amsterdam, 279-290. [Google Scholar]
  • Grimshaw, J. (1990). Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Haas, P., Huyghe, R., & Marin, R. (2008). Du verbe au nom : calques et décalages aspectuels. In Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française (CMLF), Paris, 2051-2065. [Google Scholar]
  • Habert, B. & Zweigenbaum, P. (2002). Contextual Acquisition of Information Categories: what has been done and what can be done automatically?. In The Legacy of Zellig Harris: Language and information into the 21st century, Bruce Nevin (resp.), Amsterdam, John Benjamins vol. 2. Mathematics and computability of language, Collection CILT n°229, 203–231. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Harris, Z. S. (1954). Distributional Structure. Word, 10, 146-162. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hathout, N. et C. Fabre (2002). Constitution et exploitation de lexiques de formes déverbales. Communication aux Journées d’études sur les noms déverbaux. [Google Scholar]
  • Hathout, N. & Namer, F. (2014). Démonette, a French Derivational Morpho-semantic Network. Linguistic Issues in Language Technology, 11(5), 125-168. [Google Scholar]
  • Hellinger, M. (2001). English–Gender in a Global Language. Gender Across Languages : The linguistic representation of men and women, 1, 105-113. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Heyvaert, L. (2011). Attenders or Attendees? Deverbal-ee and-er Variants in English. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(1), 62-72. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Houdebine-Gravaud, A. M. (1998). L’imaginaire linguistique: questions au modèle et applications actuelles. Limbaje şi comunicare, 9-32. [Google Scholar]
  • Huyghe, R. & Tribout, D. (2015). Noms d’agents et noms d’instruments: le cas des déverbaux en-eur. Langue française, 99-112. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kintsch, W. (2001). Predication. Cognitive science, 25, 173-202. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kleiber, G. (1990). La sémantique du prototype: catégories et sens lexical. Paris : Presses Universitaires de France. [Google Scholar]
  • Koontz-Garboden, A. (2007). States, changes of state, and the Monotonicity Hypothesis. (Phd thesis, Stanford University). [Google Scholar]
  • Kulkarni, V.; Al-Rfou, R.; Perozzi, B. & Skiena, S. (2015). Statistically Significant Detection of Linguistic Change. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW), Florence, 625-635. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Laca, B. (2001). Derivation. Language Typology and Language Universals: An International Handbook, (vol 2, p1214-1227). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. [Google Scholar]
  • Lapesa, G.; Kawaletz, L.; Plag, I.; Andreou, M.; Kisselew, M. & Pado, S. (2017). Disambiguation of Newly Derived Nominalizations in Context: A Distributional Semantics Approach. Manuscrit soumis pour publication. [Google Scholar]
  • Le Draoulec, A., & Péry-Woodley, M.P. (2016). La femme de l’écrivain [Billet de blog]. Repéré à http://bling.hypotheses.org/1405 [Google Scholar]
  • Lenoble-Pinson, M. (2008). Mettre au féminin les noms de métier : résistances culturelles et sociolinguistiques. Le français aujourd’hui, 73-79. [Google Scholar]
  • Lignon, S. (2007). Les noms de spécialistes en-iste et en-ien : le chimiste perturbé ou comment le physicien se réajuste. Perturbations et Réajustements. Langue et langage, 287-295. [Google Scholar]
  • Marcato, G., & Thüne, E. M. (2002). Gender and Female Visibility in Italian. Gender Across Languages: The Linguistic Representation of Women and Men, 2, 187-217. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Martin, F. (2010). The Semantics of Eventive Suffixes in French. The Semantics of Nominalizations across Languages and Frameworks. Berlin, Mouton de Gruyter, 109-141 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Meurice, F. (2001). Deconstructing Gender – The Case of Romanian. Gender across Languages: The linguistic representation of men and women, 1, 229-252. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013). Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space. In Proceedings of International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), Scottsdale. [Google Scholar]
  • Miller, G. A. & Charles, W. G. (1991). Contextual Correlates of Semantic Similarity. Language and cognitive processes, Taylor & Francis, 6, 1-28. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Roché, M. (2009). Pour une morphologie lexicale. Mémoires de la Société de Linguistique de Paris, n° 17, 65-87. [Google Scholar]
  • Sahlgren, M. (2008). The Distributional Hypothesis. Italian Journal of Linguistics, 20(1), 33-54. [Google Scholar]
  • Schafroth, E (2003). Gender in French - Structural Properties, Incongruences and Asymmetries. Gender Across Languages: The Linguistic Representation of Women and Men, 3, 87-117. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Schulte Im Walde, S. (2006). Experiments on the automatic induction of German semantic verb classes. Computational Linguistics, 32, 159-194. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Varvara, R.; Lapesa, G. & Padó, S. (2016). Quantifying regularity in morphological processes: An ongoing study on nominalization in German. ESSLLI DSALT Workshop: Distributional Semantics and Semantic Theory. [Google Scholar]
  • Verhoeven, B.; Daelemans, W. & van Huyssteen, G. (2012). Classification of noun-noun compound semantics in Dutch and Afrikaans. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Annual Symposium of the Pattern Recognition Association of South Africa (PRASA) Pretoria, 121-125. [Google Scholar]
  • Wagner, C.; Garcia, D.; Jadidi, M. & Strohmaier, M. (2015). It’s a Man’s Wikipedia? Assessing Gender Inequality in an Online Encyclopedia. In Proceedings of the 9th International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM), Oxford, 454-463. [Google Scholar]
  • Zeller, B. D., S. Padó, & J. Snajder (2014). Towards semantic validation of a derivational lexicon. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING), Dublin, 1728–1739. [Google Scholar]