Toile versus dictionnaires : Les nominalisations du français en-age et en-ment | Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française

Open Access

Numéro		SHS Web Conf. Volume 46, 2018 6^e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française


Numéro d'article		08003
Nombre de pages		11
Section		Morphologie
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20184608003
Publié en ligne		9 juillet 2018

Aronoff M. (2016), “Competition and the lexicon”, In: A. Elia, C. Iacobino & M. Voghera, Livelli di Analisi e fenomeni di interfaccia. Atti del XLVII congresso internazionale della società di linguistica Italiana, Roma: Bulzoni Editore, pp. 39–52. [Google Scholar]
Aronoff M. & Lindsay M. (2014), “Productivity, blocking, and lexicalization”, In: S. Lieber & P. Štekauer eds, The Handbook of Derivational Morphology, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 67–83. [Google Scholar]
Bauer L. (2001), Morphological Productivity, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Brown D. & Hippisley A. (2012), Network Morphology. A defaults-based Theory of Word Structure, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Corbett G. G. (2007), “Canonical typology, suppletion, and possible words”, Language 83, pp. 8–42. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Corbett G. G. (2010), “Canonical Derivational Morphology”, Word Structure 3, pp. 41–155. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Dal G., Fradin B., Grabar N., Lignon S., Namer F., Plancq C., Yvon F. & Zweigenbaum P. (2008), « Quelques préalables linguistiques au calcul de la productivité des règles constructionnelles et premiers résultats », In : J. Durand, B. Habert & B. Laks éds, Actes en ligne du premier Congrès mondial de linguistique française, Paris, 9-12 juillet 2008, pp. 1525-1538. [Google Scholar]
Dal G., Hathout N., Lignon S., Namer F. & Tanguy L. (2017), “Data-Driven vs. Dictionary-based description of French nominalizations in-age and in-ment: the paradigmatic evidence”, ParadigMO, First Workshop on Paradigmatic Word Formation Modeling, Université Jean Jaurès, Toulouse, 19-20 juin 2017. [Google Scholar]
Dal G., Lignon S., Namer F. & Tanguy L. (2004), « Toile contre dictionnaires : analyse morphologique en corpus de noms déverbaux concurrents », Colloque Les noms déverbaux, Université Lille 3, 23-25 septembre 2004. [Google Scholar]
Dal G. & Namer F. (2018), “Playful nonce-formations, creativity and productivity”, In: S. Arndt-Lappe, A. Braun, C. Moulin & E. Winter-Froemel eds, Expanding the Lexicon. Linguistic Innovation, Morphological Productivity, and Ludicity, Berlin & Boston, De Gruyter (The Dynamics of Wordplay 5), pp. 203–228. [Google Scholar]
Dowty D. (1991), “Thematic Proto-Roles and Argument Selection”, Language 67, pp. 547–619. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Dubois J. (1962), Étude sur la dérivation suffixale en Français moderne et contemporain, Paris, Larousse. [Google Scholar]
Fradin B. (2012), “On the correlation between-age and-ment and semantic distinctions in French nominalizations”, In 45th Annual meeting of SLE. Stockholm University, 2012. [Google Scholar]
Fradin B. (2015), “What lies at the bottom of morphological oceans?”, Paper read at the International Conference on Morphology Décembrettes 9, Toulouse 3-4 décembre 2015. [Google Scholar]
Fradin B. (2016), “Competition in derivation: what can we learn from doublets?”, Paper read at the International Morphology Meeting (IMM17), Vienna. [Google Scholar]
Hathout N. & Namer F. (2012), “Discrepancy between form and meaning in Word Formation: the case of over-and under-marking in French”, In: F. Rainer, W. U. Dressler, F. Gardani & H. C. Luschützky eds, Morphology and Meaning. Selected papers from the 15th International Morphology Meeting, Vienna, February 2012, Amsterdam, John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 177–190. [Google Scholar]
Hippisley A. (2017), “Default inheritance and the canonical. Derivation as sign builder and sign connector”, In: Gisborne N. & Hippisley A. eds, Defaults in Morphology Theory, Cambridge, Cambridge University Presse. [Google Scholar]
Kelling C. (2001), “Agentivity and Suffix Selection”, In: Proceedings of the LFG ‘01 Conference, Stanford, CA, CSLI, pp. 147–162. [Google Scholar]
Kelling C. (2003), “The Role of Agentivity for Suffix Selection”, In: G. Booij, J. De Cesaris, A. Ralli & S. Scalise eds, Topics in Morphology. Selected Papers from the Third Mediterranean Morphology Meeting, Barcelona: Institut universitari di lingüisticae aplicada, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, pp. 192–210. [Google Scholar]
Kelling C. (2004), “Protorolleneigenschaften von Verbargumenten”, In: R. Kailuweit & H. Martin eds, Semantische Rollen, Tübingen, Narr, pp. 341–354. [Google Scholar]
Lindsay M. & Aronoff M. (2013), “Natural selection in self-organizing morphological systems”, In: N. Hathout, F. Montermini & J. Tseng eds, Selected Proceedings of the 7th Décembrettes: Morphology in Toulouse. München: Lincom Europa, pp. 133–153. [Google Scholar]
Lüdtke J. (1978), Prädikative Nominalisierungen mit Suffixen im Französischen, Katalanischen und Spanischen, Tübingen, Niemeyer. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Martin F. (2010), “The semantics of eventive in French”, In: M. Rathert & A. Alexiadou eds, The Semantics of Nominalizations across Languages and Frameworks, Berlin/New York, Walter de Gruyter, pp. 109–140. [Google Scholar]
Plag I. (1999), Morphological productivity. Structural constraints in English derivation, Berlin/New York, Mouton de Gruyter. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Rainer F. (2016), “Blocking”, In: M. Aronoff ed., Linguistics: Oxford Research Encyclopedias, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 1–22. [Google Scholar]
Štekauer P. (2014), “Derivational Paradigms”, In: R. Lieber & P. Štekauer eds, The Oxford Handbook of Derivational Morphology, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 354–369. [Google Scholar]
Tanguy L. (2012), Complexification des données et des techniques en linguistique : contributions du TAL aux solutions et aux problèmes, Mémoire d’Habilitation à Diriger des Recherches, Université de Toulouse-Le Mirail, Toulouse. [Google Scholar]
Thornton A. M. (2011), “Overabundance (Multiple Forms Realizing the Same Cell): A Non-Canonical Phenomenon in Italian Verb Morphology”, In: M. Maiden, J. C. Smith, M. Goldbach & M.-O. Hinzelin eds., Morphological Autonomy: Perspectives from Romance Inflectional Morphology, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 358–381. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Thornton A. M. (2012), “Reduction and maintenance of overabundance. A case study on Italian verb paradigms”, Word Structure 5, pp. 183–207. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Tribout D. (2010), Les conversions de nom à verbe et de verbe à nom en français, Mémoire de doctorat, Université Paris Diderot, Paris. [Google Scholar]