Open Access
| Numéro |
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 46, 2018
6e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Numéro d'article | 01010 | |
| Nombre de pages | 14 | |
| Section | Discours, pragmatique et interaction | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20184601010 | |
| Publié en ligne | 9 juillet 2018 | |
- Comby, J.-B. (2015). La Question climatique. Genèse et dépolitisation d’un problème public. Paris: Raisons d’Agir. [Google Scholar]
- Fløttum, K. (2016). Linguistic Analysis Approaches for Assessing Climate Change Communication. In: Climate Science: Oxford Research Encyclopedias. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Fløttum, K. (Ed.) (2017). The role of language in the climate change debate. New York/London: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
- Fløttum, K., Dahl, T. (2012). Different Contexts, Different 'Stories'? A Linguistic Comparison of Two Development Reports on Climate Change. Language & Communication 32 (1), 14-23. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Hulme, M. (2009). Why We Disagree About Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Hulme, M. (2013). Exploring Climate Change through Science and in Society, London, Routledge. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Jones, M.D., Shanahan E.A., McBeth, M.K. (eds.). (2014). The Science of Stories. Applications of the Narrative Policy Framework in Public Policy Analysis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar]
- Krosnick, J.A., Holbrook, A.L., Lowe, L., Visser, P.S. (2006). The origins and consequences of democratic citizens’ policy agendas: A study of popular concern about global warming. Climatic Change 77, 7-43. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Krosnick, J. A., Villar, A. (2011). Global warming vs. climate change, taxes vs. prices: Does word choice matter? Climatic Change 105, 1-12. [Google Scholar]
- Leiserowitz, A. (2007). Communicating the Risks of Global Warming: American Risk Perceptions, Affective Images and Interpretive Communities". In S. Moser, S. & L. Dilling, (eds.), Creating a Climate for Change (pp. 44-63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Moser, S. C. (2016). Reflections on Climate Change Communication Research and Practice in the Second Decade of the 21 st Century: What More Is There to Say? WIREs Climate Change. doi: 10.1002/wcc.403 [Google Scholar]
- Nerlich B, Koteyko N, Brown B. (2010). Theory and Language of Climate Change Communication. WIREs Climate Change 1, 97-110. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Nisbet, M.C. (2009). Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement. Environment. Science and Policy for Sustainable Development. Retrieved from:http://www.environmentmagazine.org/Archives/Back%20Issues/March-April%202009/Nisbet-full.html (21 mai 2013). [Google Scholar]
- Nisbet, M.C., Myers, T. (2007). The polls-trends. Twenty years of public opinion about global warming. Public Opinion Quarterly 71 (3), 444470. [Google Scholar]
- Norgaard, K. M. (2006). "We don’t really want to know": Environmental justice and socially organized denial of global warming in Norway. Organization & Environment 19, 347-370. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Nølke, H., Fløttum, K., Norén, C. (2004). ScaPoLine. La théorie scandinave de la polyphonie linguistique. Paris : Kimé. [Google Scholar]
- Roberts, M. E., Stewart, B. M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S. K., Rand, D. G. (2014). Structural Topic Models for Open◻Ended Survey Responses. American Journal of Political Science 58 (4), 1064-1082. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Ryghaug, M., Sorensen, K. H., Nœss, R. (2011). Making sense of global warming: Norwegians appropriating knowledge of anthropogenic climate change. Public Understanding of Science 20, 778-795. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Steentjes, K., Pidgeon, N., Poortinga, W., Corner, A., Arnold, A., Böhm, G., Mays, C., Poumadère, M., Ruddat, M., Scheer, D., Sonnberger, M., Tvinnereim, E. (2017). European Perceptions of Climate Change: Topline findings of a survey conducted in four European countries in 2016. Cardiff: Cardiff University. [Google Scholar]
- Stoneman, P., Sturgis, P., Allum, N. (2013). Exploring public discourses about emerging technologies through statistical clustering of open-ended survey questions. Public Understanding of Science 22, 850-868. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Teigen, K. H. (2014). When very likely is not so likely. Nature Climate Change 4, 421-422. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Tvinnereim, E., Fløttum, K. 2015. Explaining topic prevalence in answers to open-ended survey questions about climate change. Nature Climate Change 5, 744–747. Doi:10.1038/nclimate2663. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Tvinnereim, E., Fløttum K., Gjerstad, Ø., Johannesson, M.P., Nordø, Å. D. (2017). Citizens' preferences for tackling climate change. Quantitative and qualitative analyses of their freely formulated solutions. Global Environmental Change 46, 34-41. [Google Scholar]
- Zaccai, E., Gemenne, F., Decroly, J.-M. (2012). Controverses climatiques, sciences et politique. Paris: Presses de Sciences Politiques. [Google Scholar]