Open Access
Numéro |
SHS Web of Conferences
Volume 27, 2016
5e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française
|
|
---|---|---|
Numéro d'article | 07006 | |
Nombre de pages | 19 | |
Section | Linguistique et Didactique (français langue première, français langue seconde) | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20162707006 | |
Publié en ligne | 4 juillet 2016 |
- Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1992). A second look at T-unit analysis: Reconsidering the sentence TESOL Quarterly, 26(2), 390-395. [Google Scholar]
- Bartning, I., & Kirchmeyer, N. (2003). Le développement de la compétence textuelle à travers les stades acquisitionnels en français L2. Acquisition et interaction en langue étrangère, 19, 9-39. [Google Scholar]
- Bartning, I., & Schlyter, S. (2004). Itinéraires acquisitionnels et stades de développement en français L2. Journal of French language studies, 14(3), 281-299. [Google Scholar]
- Beaman, K. (1984). Coordination and subordination revisited: Syntactic complexity in spoken and written narrative discourse. Dans D. Tannen (Ed.), Coherence in spoken and written discourse (pp. 45-80). Norwood, N.J.: Ablex. [Google Scholar]
- Berman, R. A., & Verhoeven, L. (2002). Cross-linguistic perspectives on the development of text-production abilities: Speech and writing. Written Language & Literacy, 5(1), 1-43. [Google Scholar]
- Biber, D., Gray, B., & Poonpon, K. (2011). Should we use characteristics of conversation to measure grammatical complexity in L2 writing development? TESOL Quarterly, 45(1), 5-35. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Bulté, B. (2013). The development of complexity in second language acquisition: a dynamic systems approach. (thèse de doctorat), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel. [Google Scholar]
- Byrnes, H. (2009). Emergent L2 German writing ability in a curricular context: A longitudinal study of grammatical metaphor. Linguistics and Education, 20, 50-66. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Cosme, C. (2007). Clause linking across languages. A corpus-based study of coordination and subordination in English, French and Dutch. (thèse de doctorat), Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve. [Google Scholar]
- Dahl, Ö. (2009). Testing the assumption of complexity Invariance: the case of Elfdalian and Swedish. Dans G. Sampson, D. Gil & P. Trudgill (Eds.), Language Complexity as an Evolving Variable (pp. 50-63). Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Foster, P., Tonkyn, A., & Wigglesworth, G. (2000). Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons. Applied Linguistics, 21(3), 354-375. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Housen, A., & Kuiken, F. (2009). Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 461-473. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Housen, A., Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (Eds.). (2012). Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Hunt, K. (1965). Grammatical structures written at three grade levels. Champaign, Ill: National Council of Teachers of English. [Google Scholar]
- IBM. (2015). IBM SPSS Statistics (Version 23.0). [Google Scholar]
- Jarvis, S., & Daller, M. (Eds.). (2013). Vocabulary knowledge: Human ratings and automated measures. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Kerr-Barnes, B. (1998). The acquisition of connectors in French L2 narrative discourse. Journal of French language studies, 8(2), 189-208. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Klein, W., & Perdue, C. (1997). The Basic Variety (or: Couldn’t natural languages be much simpler?). Second Language Research, 13(4), 301-347. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Kirchmeyer, N. (2002). Étude de la compétence textuelle des lectes d’apprenants avancés. Aspects structurels, fonctionnels et informationnels. Cahiers de la Recherche 20. (Thèse de doctorat), Université de Stockholm, Stockholm. [Google Scholar]
- Kormos, J., & Trebits, A. (2012). The role of task complexity, modality, and aptitude in narrative task performance. Language Learning, 62(2), 439-472. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Kortmann, B., & Szmrecsanyi, B. (Eds.). (2012). Linguistic complexity, second language acquisition, indigenization, contact. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Lambert, C., & Kormos, J. (2014). Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in task-based L2 research: Toward more developmentally based measures of second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 2014, 1-9. [Google Scholar]
- MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [Google Scholar]
- Malvern, D., Richards, B. J., Chipere, N., & Duran, P. (2004). Lexical diversity and language development: Quantification and assessment. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Mayer, M. (1969). Frog, Where are you? New York: Dial Press. [Google Scholar]
- Miestamo, M. (2008). Grammatical complexity in a cross-linguistic perspective. Dans M. Miestamo, K. Sinnemäki & F. Karlsson (Eds.), Language complexity: Typology, contact, change (pp. 23-41). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Miestamo, M. (2009). Implicational hierarchies and grammatical complexity. Dans G. Sampson, D. Gil & P. Trudgill (Eds.), Language complexity as an evolving variable (pp. 80-97). Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Miestamo, M., Sinnemäki, K., & Karlsson, F. (Eds.). (2008). Language complexity: Typology, contact, change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2009). Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 555-578. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Ortega, L. (2012). Interlanguage complexity: A construct in search of theoretical renewal. Dans B. Kortmann & B. Szmrecsanyi (Eds.), Linguistic complexity: Second language acquisition, indigenization, contact (pp. 127-155). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. [Google Scholar]
- Pallotti, G. (2009). CAF: Defining, refining and differentiating constructs. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 590-601. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Pallotti, G. (2015). A simple view of linguistic complexity. Second Language Research, 31(1), 117-134. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Paprocka-Piotrowska, U., Martinot, C., & Gerolimich, S. (Eds.). (2013). La complexité en langue et son acquisition. Lublin: Towarzystwo Naukowe Kul Katolicki Uniwersytet Jana Pawla II. [Google Scholar]
- Pierrard, M., & Housen, A. (2013). Complexité linguistique et efficacité d’un enseignement grammatical explicite. Dans U. Paprocka-Piotrowska, C. Martinot & S. Gerolimich (Eds.), La complexité en langue et son acquisition (pp. 285-304). Lublin: Towarzystwo Naukowe Kul Katolicki Uniwersytet Jana Pawla II. [Google Scholar]
- Scarborough, H. S. (1990). Index of productive syntax. Applied Psycholinguistics, 11, 1-22. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Skehan, P. (2009). Performance by native and non-native speakers on language-learning tasks. Dans In B. J. Richards, M. Daller, D. Malvern, P. Meara, J. Milton & J. Treffers-Daller (Eds.), Vocabulary studies in first and second language acquisition: The interface between theory and application (pp. 107-124). London: Palgrave Macmillian. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Szmrecsanyi, B. (2004). On operationalizing syntactic complexity. Présenté à la conférence JADT 2004, Louvain la Neuve. [Google Scholar]
- Szmrecsanyi, B., & Kortmann, B. (2012). Introduction: Linguistic complexity. Dans B. Kortmann & B. Szmrecsanyi (Eds.), Linguistic complexity: Second language acquisition, indigenization, contact. Boston: De Gruyter. [Google Scholar]
- Verspoor, M., Schmid, M. S., & Xu, X. (2012). A dynamic usage based perspective on L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 239-263. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Welcomme, A. (2013). Connecteurs et complexité syntaxique dans les récits d’apprenants néerlandophones de FLE : premiers résultats. Dans U. Paprocka-Piotrowska, C. Martinot & S. Gerolimich (Eds.), La complexité en langue et son acquisition (pp. 261-284). Lublin: Towarzystwo Naukowe Kul Katolicki Uniwersytet Jana Pawla II. [Google Scholar]
- Wolfe-Quintero, K., Inagaki, S., & Kim, H.-Y. (1998). Second language development in writing: Measures of fluency, accuracy, and complexity. Honolulu: National Foreign Language Resource Center. [Google Scholar]