Open Access
Issue
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 191, 2024
9e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française
Article Number 01024
Number of page(s) 14
Section Discours, pragmatique et interaction
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202419101024
Published online 28 juin 2024
  • Allwright, R. L. (1984). The importance of interaction in classroom language learning. Applied Linguistics, 5(2), 156–171. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bell, N. D. (2017). Humor and second language development. In S. Attardo (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and humor (pp. 444–455). Routledge. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Blum-Kulka, S., Hamo, M., & Habib, T. (2010). Explanations in naturally occurring peer talk: Conversational emergence and function, thematic scope, and contribution to the development of discursive skills. First Language, 30(3–4), 440–460. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723710370528 [Google Scholar]
  • Cekaite, A., & Aronsson, K. (2004). Repetition and joking in children’s second language conversations: Playful recyclings in an immersion classroom. Discourse Studies, 6(3), 373–392. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cook, G. (2000). Language play, language learning. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • de Gaulmyn, M.-M. (1991). Expliquer des explications. In U. Dausendschön-Gay, E. Gülich, & U. Krafft (Eds.), Linguistische Interaktionsanalysen (pp. 279–314). Max Niemeyer Verlag. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Drew, P. (1987). Po-faced receipts of teases. Linguistics, 25, 219–253. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Drew, P., & Heritage, J. (1992). Analyzing talk at work: an introduction. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work. Interaction in institutional settings (pp. 3–65). Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Eilola, L. (2020). Keholliset ja materiaaliset sananselityssekvenssit aikuisten S2-lukutaito-opiskelijoiden luokkahuonevuorovaikutuksessa. Virittäjä, 124, 243–277. https://doi.org/10.23982/vir.77994 [Google Scholar]
  • Evnitskaya, N., & Berger, E. (2017). Learners’ Multimodal Displays of Willingness to Participate in Classroom Interaction in the L2 and CLIL Contexts. Classroom Discourse, 8(1), 71–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2016.1272062 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Fasel Lauzon, V. (2009). L'explication dans les interactions en classe de langue: organisation des séquences, mobilisation de ressources, opportunités d'apprentissage [Thèse de doctorat, Université de Neuchâtel]. [Google Scholar]
  • Fasel Lauzon, V. (2014). Comprendre et apprendre dans l'interaction. Les séquences d'explication en classe de français langue seconde. Peter Lang. [Google Scholar]
  • Gajo, L., & Mondada, L. (2000). Interactions et acquisitions en contexte: modes d'appropriation de compétences discursives plurilingues par de jeunes immigrés. Editions Universitaires Fribourg Suisse. [Google Scholar]
  • Glenn, P. (2003). Laughter in interaction (Vol. 18). Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(10), 1489–1522. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gülich, E. (1990). L'approche ethnométhodologique dans l'analyse du français parlé. In M. Charolles, S. Fisher, & J. Jayez (Eds.), Le discours. Représentations et interprétations (pp. 71–110). Presses universitaires de Nancy. [Google Scholar]
  • Holt, E. (2007). 'I'm eyeing your chop up mind': reporting and enacting. In E. Holt & R. Clift (Eds.), Reporting Talk. Reported speech in interaction (Vol. 24, pp. 47–80). Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R. (1998). Conversation analysis: Principles, practices and applications. Blackwell. [Google Scholar]
  • Jacknick, C. M. (2011). "But this is writing": Post-expansion in student-initiated sequences. Novitas-ROYAL, 5(1), 39–54. [Google Scholar]
  • Jacknick, C. M. (2021). Multimodal Particiption and Engagement. Social Interaction in the Classroom. Edinburgh University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Janin, L. (2023). A multimodal perspective on adult learners’ vocabulary explanations in the beginner-level L2 classroom. Classroom Discourse, 1–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2023.2222857 [Google Scholar]
  • Janin, L. (2024). Les explications collaboratives d'apprenant-es issu-es de la migration en classe de français L2: une approche interactionnelle et multimodale [Thèse de doctorat, Université de Neuchâtel]. [Google Scholar]
  • Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation (pp. 13–31). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/doi:10.1075/pbns.125.02jef [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kasparek, N. (2015). Facetious language play for creative repetition. New Directions in Teaching and Learning English Discussion, 3, 118–127. [Google Scholar]
  • Kasper, G., & Wagner, J. (2011). A conversation-analytic approach to second language acquisition. In D. Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative Approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 114–142). Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  • Kim, S., & Park, S.-H. (2017). Humor in the Language Classroom: A Review of the Literature. Primary English Education, 23(4), 241–262. [Google Scholar]
  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lazaraton, A. (2004). Gesture and speech in the vocabulary explanations of one ESL teacher: a microanalytic inquiry. Language Learning, 54(1), 79–117. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Leslie, C. (2015). Humour in peer interaction in the L2 classroom. e-TEALS, 6(1), 51–67. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lo, C. H. Y. (2016). Embodied vocabulary explanation in ESL group interaction: a preliminary account. TESOL & Applied Linguistics, 16(2), 29–34. [Google Scholar]
  • Majlesi, A. R., & Broth, M. (2012). Emergent learnables in second language classroom interaction. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 1, 193–207. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Markee, N. (1994). Toward an Ethnomethodological Respecification of Second-Language Acquisition Studies. In E. E. Tarone, S. M. Gass, & A. D. Cohen (Eds.), Research Methodology in Second-Language Acquisition (pp. 89–116). Lawrence Erlbaum. [Google Scholar]
  • McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and Mind. What gestures reveal about thought. University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Merke, S. (2018). Challenging and objecting: Functions of third position turns in student-initiated question sequences. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 33, 298–315. [Google Scholar]
  • Mondada, L. (2018). Multiple Temporalities of Language and Body in Interaction: Challenges for Transcribing Multimodality. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 51(1), 85–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2018.1413878 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mondada, L., & Pekarek Doehler, S. (2004). Second language acquisition as situated practice: Task accomplishment in the French second language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 88(4), 501–518. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Morek, M. (2015). Show that you know–Explanations, interactional identities and epistemic stance-taking in family talk and peer talk. Linguistics and Education, 31, 238–259. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mori, J. (2004). Negociating sequential boundaries and learning opportunities: A case from a Japanese language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 88(4), 536–550. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mortensen, K. (2009). Establishing Recipiency in Pre-Beginning Position in the Second Language Classroom. Discourse Processes, 46(5), 491–515. https://doi.org/10.1080/ Mortensen, K. (2011). Doing word explanation in interaction. In G. Palloti & J. Wagner (Eds.), L2 Learning as Social Practice: Conversation-Analytic Perspectives (pp. 135–162). National Foreign Language Resource Center. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Morton, T. (2015). Vocabulary explanations in CLIL classrooms: a conversation analysis perspective. the language learning journal, 43(3), 256–270. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pekarek Doehler, S. (2010). Conceptual changes and methodological challenges: On language and learning from a conversation analytic perspective on SLA. In P. Seedhouse, S. Walsh, & C. Jenks (Eds.), Conceptualising learning in applied linguistics (pp. 105–126). Palgrave Mcmilan. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pekarek Doehler, S., & Pochon-Berger, E. (2015). The development of L2 interactional competence: evidence from turn-taking organization, sequence organization, repair organization and preference organization. In S. W. Eskildsen & T. Cadierno (Eds.), Usage-based perspectives on second language learning (pp. 233–268). Walter de Gruyter. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pomerantz, A. (1986). Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims. Human Studies, 9, 219–229. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pomerantz, A., & Bell, N. D. (2011). Humor as safe house in the foreign language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 95, 148–161. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sert, O. (2015). Social Interaction and L2 Classroom Discourse. Edinburgh University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Skogmyr Marian, K. (2022). The Development of L2 Interactional Competence: A Multimodal Study of Complaining in French Interactions. Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  • Skogmyr Marian, K., Petitjean, C., & Pekarek Doehler, S. (2017). Le dévelopement de la compétence d'interaction en langue seconde: état des lieux et illustrations empiriques. Revue Française de Linguistique Appliquée, XXII(2), 127–145. [Google Scholar]
  • Stoewer, K., & Musk, N. (2019). Impromptu vocabulary work in English mother tongue instruction. Classroom Discourse, 10(2), 123–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2018.1516152 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Streeck, J. (2009). Chapter 6: Depiction. In J. Streeck (Ed.), Gesturecraft. The manu-facture of meaning (pp. 119–150). John Benjamins. [Google Scholar]
  • Tai, K. W. H., & Brandt, A. (2018). Creating an imaginary context: teacher’s use of embodied enactments in addressing learner initiatives in a beginner-level adult ESOL classroom. Classroom Discourse, 9(3), 244–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2018.1496345 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Waring, H. Z., Creider, S. C., & Box, C. D. (2013). Explaining vocabulary in the second language classroom: A conversation analytic account. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 2, 249–264. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wray, A. (2002). Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]