De l’usage existentiel des verbes de perception | Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française

Open Access

Numéro		SHS Web Conf. Volume 138, 2022 8^e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française


Numéro d'article		11002
Nombre de pages		14
Section		Sémantique
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202213811002
Publié en ligne		11 mai 2022

Abbott, B. (1993). A pragmatic account of the definiteness effect in existential sentences. Journal of Pragmatics, 19, 39-55. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Achard, M. (2015). Impersonals and other Agent Defocusing Constructions in French. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins. [Google Scholar]
Bentley, D., Ciconte, F.M. & Cruschina, S. (2013). Existential constructions in crosslinguistic perspective. Rivista di Linguistica, 25(1), 1-13. [Google Scholar]
Bentley, D., Ciconte, F.M. & Cruschina, S. (2015). Existentials and Locatives in Romance Dialects of Italy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Bergen, B. & Planché, M. (2005). The convergent evolution of radial constructions: French and English deictics and existentials. Cognitive Linguistics, 16(1), 1-42. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Beyssade, C. (2004). Les constructions existentielles. In Beyssade, C. & Dobrovie-Sorin, C. Définir les indéfinis. Paris: CNRS. [Google Scholar]
Cappeau, P. & Schnedecker, C. (2014). Des gens bien différents à l’oral et à l’écrit. Hypothèses sur la pronominalisation des SN en gens. Verbum, 36, 55-74. [Google Scholar]
Carlier, A. & Sarda, L. (2010). Le complément de la localisation spatiale: entre argument et adjoint. In Neveu, F., Muni-Toké, V., Durand, J., Klingler, T., Mondada, L. & Prévost, S. (eds.). Actes du CMLF'10, Paris, ILF, 2057-2073. [Google Scholar]
Carlson, G. N. (1977). Reference to Kinds in English. Ph.D. thesis. University of Massachusetts. Amherst. [Google Scholar]
Charolles, M. (2002). La référence et les expressions référentielles en français. Paris: Ophrys. [Google Scholar]
Col, G., Danino, Ch. & Bikialo, S. (2020). Polysémie, usages et fonctions de voilà. Berlin / Boston: De Gruyter. [Google Scholar]
Creissels, D. (2014). Existential predication in typological perspective. 46th Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea, Split, 18 - 21 September 2013. [Google Scholar]
Heine, B. (2002). On the role of context in grammatica lization. In Wischer, I. & Diewald, G. (eds.). New reflections on grammaticalization. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: Benjamins, 83-101. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Hopper, P. J. & Thompson, S. A. (1980). Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse. Language, 56(2), 251-299. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Huumo, T. (2003). Incremental Existence: The World According to the Finnish Existential Sentence. Linguistics, 41(3), 461–493. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Jespersen, O. (1924). The philosophy of grammar. London: George Allan & Unwin. [Google Scholar]
Karssenberg, L. (2018). Non-prototypical clefts in French: A corpus analysis of French il y a clefts. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. [Google Scholar]
Karssenberg, L. & Lahousse, K. (2018). The information structure of French il y a clefts & c’est clefts: a corpus-based analysis. Linguistics, 56(3), 513-548. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Kleiber, G. (1981). Relatives spécifiantes et relatives non-spécifiantes, Le Français Moderne, 49(3), 216-233. [Google Scholar]
Koch, P. (2012). Location, existence, and possession: A constructional-typological exploration. Linguistics, 50(3), 533-603. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2012-0018 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Lambrecht, K. (1987). On the status of SVO sentences in French discourse. In Tomlin, R. (ed.). Coherence and Grounding in Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 217-261. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Lambrecht, K. (1994). Information structure and sentence form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Lambrecht, K. (2000). Prédication seconde et structure informationnelle: la relative de perception comme construction présentative. Langue française, 127, 49-66. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Lambrecht, K. (2002) Topic, Focus and secondary predication. The French presentational relative construction. In Beyssade, C. (eds.), Romance languages and linguistic theory 2000. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 171-212. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Lambrecht, K. & Polinsky, M. (1997). Typological variation in sentence-focus constructions. In Singar, K. (ed.). CLS 33. Papers from the panels on: linguistic ideologies in contact; universal grammar, parameters and typology; the perception of speech and other acoustic signals. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, 189–206. [Google Scholar]
Leonetti, M. (2008). Definiteness effects and the role of the coda in existential constructions. In Høeg Müller, H. & Klinge, A. (eds.), Essays on Nominal Determination: From morphology to discourse management. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 131-162. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Lyons, J. (1999). Definiteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
McNally, (1992). An interpretation for the English existential construction. University of California, Santa Cruz. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. [Google Scholar]
McNally, L. (2011). 69. Existential sentences. In von Heusinger, K., Maienborn, C. & Portner, P. (eds.). Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science, Volume 2, Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 1829-1848. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110255072.1829 [Google Scholar]
Meulleman, M. & Roegiest, E. (2012). Los locativos en la valencia de la construcción existencial española: ¿actante o circunstante?. Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie, 128(1), 57-70. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Milsark, G. (1977). Towards an explanation of certain particularities of existential sentences in English. Linguistic Analysis, 3, 1-30. [Google Scholar]
Partee, B. H. & Borschev, V. (2007). Existential sentences, BE, and the genitive of negation in Russian. In Comorovski, I. & von Heusinger, K. (eds.). Existence: Semantics and syntax. Dordrecht: Springer., 147–190. [Google Scholar]
Pfenninger, S. (2009). Grammaticalization Paths of English and High German Existential Constructions. Berne: Peter Lang. [Google Scholar]
Sasse, H.-J. (1987). The thetic/ categorical distinction revisited. Linguistics, 25, 511-580. [Google Scholar]
Van de Velde, D. (2005). Les interprétations partitive et existentielle des indéfinis dans les phrases existentielles locatives. Travaux de linguistique, 50, 37-52. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Viberg, Å. (2008). Swedish verbs of perception from a typological and contrastive perspective. In de los Ángeles Gómez González, M., Lachlan Mackenzie, J. & González Álvarez, E. M. (eds.). Languages and Cultures in Contrast and Comparison. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 123–172. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Vogeleer, S. (1994). L’accès perceptuel à l’information: à propos des expressions un homme arrive / on voit arriver un homme. Langue française, 102, 69-83. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]