Open Access
| Numéro |
SHS Web Conf.
Volume 138, 2022
8e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Numéro d'article | 09001 | |
| Nombre de pages | 14 | |
| Section | Psycholinguistique et acquisition | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202213809001 | |
| Publié en ligne | 11 mai 2022 | |
- Authier, J. M., Haegeman, L., 2019. “The Syntax of Mirative Focus Fronting: Evidence from French”, in Arteaga, D. L. (eds), Contributions of Romance Languages to Current Linguistic Theory, Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 95 (3). [Google Scholar]
- Cruschina, S., 2021. “The Greater the Contrast, the Greater the Potential: On the Effects of Focus in Syntax.”, Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 6 (1). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Cruschina, S., Remberger, E. M., 2017. “14. Focus Fronting.”, in Dufter, A., Stark, E. (eds), Manual of Romance Morphosyntax and Syntax, Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter, pp. 502-35. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- De Cesare, A.M., 2017. “Cleft Constructions in romance: definition, types, and parameters of variation”, in Dufter, A., and Stark, E. (eds), Manual of Romance Morphosyntax and Syntax, Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter, pp. 536-568. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- De Cesare, A. M., Garassino, D., 2018. “Chapter 9. Adverbial Cleft Sentences in Italian, French and English: A Comparative Perspective.”, in García García, M., Uth, M. (eds), Focus Realization in Romance and Beyond, Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 255-86. [Google Scholar]
- Destruel, E., Donaldson, B., 2017. “Second language acquisition of pragmatic inferences: Evidence from the French c’est –cleft”, Applied Psycholinguistics, 38(3), pp. 703-732. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Dimroth, C., Narasimhan, B., 2012. “The acquisition of information structure”, in Krifka, M., Musan, R. (eds), The Expression of Information Structure, Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 319-362. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Donaldson, B., 2016. “Aspects of interrogative use in near-native French: Form, function, and register”, Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 6. [Google Scholar]
- Dufter, A., 2009. “Clefting and Discourse Organization: Comparing Germanic and Romance”, in Dufter, A., Jacob, D. (eds), Focus and Background in Romance Languages, Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 83-121. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Gabriel, C., Grünke, J., 2018. “Focus, prosody, and subject positions in L3 Spanish: Analyzing data from German learners with Italian and European Portuguese as heritage languages”, in García García, M., Uth, M. (eds), Focus realization in romance and beyond, Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 357-386. [Google Scholar]
- Hertel, T. J., 2003. “Lexical and discourse factors in the second language acquisition of Spanish word order”, Second Language Research 19(4), pp. 273-304. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Katz, S., 2000. “Categories of ‘c’est’-Cleft Constructions”, Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 45, pp. 253-73. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Kupisch, T., Rothman, J., 2016. “Interfaces with syntax in language acquisition”, in Fischer, S., Gabriel, C. (eds), Manual of Grammatical Interfaces in Romance, Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 551-585. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Lambrecht, K., 2012. Information structure and sentence form: topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Lambrecht, K., 2001. “A Framework for the Analysis of Cleft Constructions”, Linguistics, 39, pp. 463-516. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Lobo, M., Martins, A. M., 2017. “Subjects”, in Dufter, A., and Stark, E. (eds), Manual of Romance Morphosyntax and Syntax, Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter. [Google Scholar]
- Lozano, C., 2006. “Focus and split-intransitivity: the acquisition of word order alternations in non-native Spanish”, Second Language Research, 22(2), pp. 145-187. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Molnar, V., 2002. “Contrast from a Contrastive Perspective.”, in Hallelgard, H., Behrens, B. and Fabricius-Hansen, C. (eds), Information Structure in a Cross-Linguistic Perspective, Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi, pp. 147-161. [Google Scholar]
- Repp, S., 2010. “Defining ‘contrast’ as an Information-Structural Notion in Grammar”, Lingua, 120(6), pp. 1333-1345. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Repp, S., 2016. “Contrast”: Dissecting an Elusive Information-Structural Notion and Its Role in Grammar”, in Féry, C., Ishihara, S. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Information Structure, 1–23. [Google Scholar]
- Ringbom, H., Jarvis, S. 2009. “The Importance of Cross-Linguistic Similarity in Foreign Language Learning”, in Long, M. H., Doughty, C. J. (eds), The Handbook of Language Teaching. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. [Google Scholar]
- Roggia, C. E., 2008. “Frasi Scisse in italiano e in francese orale: evidenze dal C-ORAL-ROM.”, Cuadernos de Filología Italiana, 15: 21. [Google Scholar]
- Romero, M., 2020. “Form and Function of Negative, Tag, and Rhetorical Questions.” In The Oxford Handbook of Negation. Oxford Handbooks Online. [Google Scholar]
- Rothman, J., 2010. “On the typological economy of syntactic transfer: Word order and relative clause high/low attachment preference in L3 Brazilian Portuguese”, International Review of Applied Linguistics in Teaching (IRAL), 48, pp., 245–273. [Google Scholar]
- Van den Steen, K., 2005. “Cleft Constructions in French and Spanish”, in Delbecque, N., Van der Auwera, J., Geeraerts, D. (eds), Perspectives on Variation, Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton. [Google Scholar]
- Zubizarreta, M. L., Nava, E., 2011. “Encoding discourse-based meaning: Prosody vs. syntax. Implications for second language acquisition”, Lingua, 121, pp. 652-669. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]