L’influence de la langue écrite au cours du développement langagier tardif | Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française

Open Access

Numéro		SHS Web of Conferences Volume 27, 2016 5^e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française


Numéro d'article		01001
Nombre de pages		20
Section		Conférences invitées
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20162701001
Publié en ligne		4 juillet 2016

Adam, J.M. 1985. Le texte narratif, précis d’analyse textuelle. Poitiers: Fernand Nathan. [Google Scholar]
Ailhaud, E., Chenu, F., Jisa, H. soumis. La phrase : de la maîtrise de ses conventions raphiques à sa pertinence cognitive. [Google Scholar]
Ailhaud, E., Chenu, F., Jisa, H. 2015. A developmental perspective on the units of written French. In Perera, J., Aparici, M., Rosado, E. & Salas, N. (Eds), Written and spoken language development across the lifespan: Essays in honour of Liliana Tolchinsky. Springer, 287-305. [Google Scholar]
Aisenman, R. et Berman, R. 2000. Rethinking lexical analysis. Developing Literacy Across Genres, Modalities, and Languages 3: 187-196. [Google Scholar]
Aksu-Koç, A. et Küntay, A. 2001. Reformulating causal relations while retelling narratives: evidence from Turkish. Papier présenté au Colloque Acquisition et construction du sens dans une perspective interlangue, Paris, 20-21 décembre 2001. [Google Scholar]
Allen, S., Skarabela, B. et Hughes, M. 2008. Using corpora to examine discourse effects in syntax. Trends in language acquisition research, Corpora in language acquisition research 6: 99-138. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Argerich, N. et Tolchinsky, L. 2000. On a definition of lexical items in written and spoken texts. Developing Literacy Across Genres, Modalities and Languages 3: 197-204. [Google Scholar]
Ariel, M. 1990. Accessing Noun Phrases Antecedents. London: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
Ariel, M. 1996. Referring expressions and the +/- coreference distinction. In Fretheim, T., Gundel, J. (eds.), Reference and referent accessibility. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 13-37. [Google Scholar]
Ashby, William J., 1992. The variable use of on versus tu/vous. Journal of French Language Studies, 2: 135-157. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Atlani, Françoise, 1984. On l’illusionniste. In : A. Grésillon. et J-L ; Lebrave, La langue au ras du texte, 13-29. Lille : Presses Universitaires de Lille. [Google Scholar]
Auer, P. (2009). On-line syntax: Thoughts on the temporality of spoken language. Language Sciences 31: 1-13. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Bellert, I. 1971. On a condition of the coherence of texts. Semiotica 4: 253-288. [Google Scholar]
Berman, R. 1997. Preliterate knowledge of language. In Portecovo, C. (eds.), Writing development: an interdisciplinary view. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 61-76. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Berman, R. 2000. Thematic perspectives on how children talk about interpersonal conflict. Developing Literacy Across Genres, Modalities, And Languages 3: 65-76. [Google Scholar]
Berman, R. 2007. Developing linguistic knowledge and language use across adolescence, In Hoff, E., Shatz, M. (Eds.). Handbook of Language Development. London: Blackwell, 346-367. [Google Scholar]
Berman, R. et Katzenberger, I. 2004. Form and function in introducing narrative and expository texts: A developmental perspective. Discourse Processes 381: 57-94. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Berman, R. et Nir-Sagiv, B. 2004. Linguistic indicators of inter-genre differentiation in later language development. Journal of Child Language 31: 339-380. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Berman, R. et Nir-Sagiv, B. 2007. Comparing narrative and expository text construction across adolescence: A developmental paradox. Discourse Processes 43: 79-120. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Berman, R. et Ravid, D. 2009. Becoming a literate language user oral and written text construction across adolescence. In Olson, D., Torrance, N. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Literacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 92-111. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Berman, R. et Slobin, D. 1994. Relating events in narrative: a crosslinguistic developmental study. Hillsdale: Erlbaum. [Google Scholar]
Berman, R. et Verhoeven, L. 2002. Cross linguistic perspectives on the development of text-production abilities in speech and writing. Written Language and Literacy 5 Vol. 1. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Berman, R. et Verhoeven, L. 2002. Cross linguistic perspectives on the development of text-production abilities in speech and writing. Written Language and Literacy 5 Vol. 2. [Google Scholar]
Biber, D. 1988. Variations across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
Blanche-Benveniste, C. 1983. L’importance du français parlé pour la description du français tout court. Recherches sur le Français Parlé 5: 23-45. [Google Scholar]
Blanche-Benveniste, C. 1985. La langue du dimanche. Reflets 14: 42-43. [Google Scholar]
Blanche-Benveniste, C. 1990. Le français parlé. Paris: Edition du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique. [Google Scholar]
Blanche-Benveniste, C. 1995. Le semblable et le dissemblable en syntaxe. Recherches sur le Français Parlé 13: 7-32. [Google Scholar]
Blanche-Benveniste, C. 2000. Approche de la langue parlée en français. Gap: Ophrys. [Google Scholar]
Boersma P. et Weenink D. 2009. Praat: doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.1.05) [Programme informatique], site internet : http://www.praat.org/. [Google Scholar]
Boscolo, P. 1990. The construction of expository text. First Language 10: 217-230. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Britton, B. 1994. Understanding expository text: Building mental structures to induce insights. In Gernsbacher, M. (Eds.). Handbook of Psycholinguistics. San Diego, California: Academic Press, 641-674. [Google Scholar]
Bruner, J. 1986. Actual Minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar]
Chafe, W. 1994. Discourse, consciousness, and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar]
Charolles, M. 1978. Introduction aux problèmes de la cohérence des textes. Langue Française 38: 7-41. [Google Scholar]
Chenu F., Jisa H. et Mazur-Palandre A. 2012. Développement de la connectivité syntaxique à travers deux types de textes à l’oral et à l’écrit. In F. Neveu, V. Muni Toke, P. Blumenthal, T. Klingler, P. Ligas, S. Prévost, S. Teston-Bonnard (Eds.), Actes de la Xème Congrès Mondial de la Linguistique Française (CMLF 2012), 4-7 Juillet, Lyon : Institut de Linguistique Française ; EDP Sciences, 1591-1605. [Google Scholar]
Chesnet, D. et Alamargot, D. 2005. Analyses en temps réel des activités oculaires et graphomotrices du scripteur: intérêt du dispositif ‘Eye and Pen’. L’Année Psychologique 105: 477-520. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Clark, H. et Haviland, S. 1977. Comprehension and the Given-New contract. In Freedle, R. (Eds.), Discourse Production and Comprehension. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1-40. [Google Scholar]
Du Bois, J. 1987. The discourse basis of ergativity. Language 63: 805-855. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Du Bois, J. 2003. Argument Structure: Grammar in use. In Du Bois, J., Kumpf, L., Ashby, W. (eds.), Preferred Argument Structure: Grammar as architecture for function. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 11-60. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Fayol, M. 1990. La production de textes écrits, Introduction à l’approche cognitive. Education Permanente 102: 21-30. [Google Scholar]
Fayol, M. 1996. La production d’écrits narratifs : approche de psycholinguistique textuelle chez l’enfant et l’adulte. In David, J. et Plane, S. (éds.) L’apprentissage de l’écriture de l’école au collège. Paris : PUF, 9-36. [Google Scholar]
Fayol, M. 1997. Des idées au texte : psychologie cognitive de la production verbale orale et écrite. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. [Google Scholar]
Gadet, F. 1989. Le français ordinaire. Paris: Armand colin éditeur. [Google Scholar]
Gadet, F. 1996. Une distinction bien fragile : oral/écrit. TRANEL (Travaux neuchâtelois de linguistique) 25: 13-27. [Google Scholar]
Gayraud, F. 2000. Le développement de la différenciation oral/écrit vu à travers le lexique. Thèse de Doctorat, Université Lumière, Lyon 2. [Google Scholar]
Gayraud, F., Jisa, H. et Viguié, A. 1999. The development of syntactic packaging in French children’s written and spoken texts. Developing Literacy Across Genres, Modalities, And Languages 1: 169-181. [Google Scholar]
Gayraud, F., Jisa, H. et Viguié, A. 2001. Utilisation des outils cohésifs comme indice de sensibilité au registre : une étude développementale. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Étrangère 14: 3-24. [Google Scholar]
Gernsbacher, M. 1990. Language comprehension as structure building. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [Google Scholar]
Gernsbacher, M. et Hargreaves, D. 1988. Accessing sentence participants: the advantage of first mention. Journal of Memory and Language 27: 699-717. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Halliday, M.A.K. et Hasan, R. 1976-1989. Cohesion in English. Londres: Longman group limited. [Google Scholar]
Hawkins, J. 1983. Word order universals. New York: Academic press. [Google Scholar]
Hickmann, M. 2003. Children’s Discourse: Person, Space and Time across Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
Hickmann, M. et Hendriks, H. 1999. Cohesion and anaphora in children’s narratives: a comparison of English, French, German and Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Child Language 26: 419-452. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Hickmann, M., Hendriks, H., Roland, F. et Liang, J. 1996. The marking of new information in children’s narratives: a comparison of English, French, German, and Mandarin Chinese. Journal of child Languages 23: 591-619. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Jisa, H. & Viguié, A. 2005. A developmental perspective on the role of on in written and spoken expository texts in French. Journal of Pragmatics, 37: 125-142. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Jisa, H. 1998. Relative clauses in French children’s narrative text. Journal of Child Language 25: 623-652. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Jisa, H. 2000. Increasing cohesion in narratives: a developmental study of maintaining and reintroducing subjects in French. Linguistics 38: 591-620. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Jisa, H. 2004. Growing into academic French. Later Language Development: Typological and psycholinguistic Perspectives, Collection Trends in Language Acquisition Research (TILAR) 3: 135-162. [Google Scholar]
Jisa, H. et Mazur, A. 2006. L’expression de la causalité : une étude développementale. Actes Journée d’étude : Des savoirs savants aux savoirs enseignés. Université Paris X, Nanterre : Presses universitaires de Namur, 33-60, 29 Mars 2006. [Google Scholar]
Johansson, V. 1999. Word frequencies in speech and Writing: a study of expository discourse. Genre and modality in developing discourse abilities 1: 182-198. [Google Scholar]
Katzenberger, I. 2004. The development of clause packaging in spoken and written texts. Journal of Pragmatics 36: 1921-1948. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Khorounjaia, E. et Tolchinsky, L. 2004. Discursive constraints on the lexical realization of arguments in Spanish, In Berman, R. (Eds.). Language Development Across Childhood and Adolescence, Collection Trends in Language Acquisition Research, (TILAR), Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 83-110. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Koenig, Jean-Pierre. 1999. On a tué le président! The nature of passives and ultra-indefinites. In: Barbara Fox, Dan Jurafsky and Laura A. Michaelis, Cognition and function in language, 235-251. Stanford: CSLI Publications. [Google Scholar]
Laberge, Suzanne and Gillain Sankoff, 1980. Anything you can do. In: Gillian Sankoff., The social life of language, 271-293. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. [Google Scholar]
Laberge, Suzanne. 1978. The changing distribution of indeterminate pronouns in discourse. In: R. W. Shuy and J. Shnukal, Language use and the use of language. Washington: Georgetown University Press. [Google Scholar]
Labov, W. 1978/1993. Le parler ordinaire, la langue dans les ghettos noirs des états-unis. Paris: Les éditions de minuit. [Google Scholar]
Lambrecht, K. 1994. Information structure and sentence form: topic, focus and mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
Langacker, R. 2000. A Dynamic Usage-Based Model. In Michael Barlow et Suzanne Kemmer (éds.), Usage-Based Models of Language. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 1-63. [Google Scholar]
Levelt, W. 1989. Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge/Massachussetts: The MIT Press. [Google Scholar]
MacWhinney, B. (2002) Language emergence. In Burmeister, P., Piske, T., and Rohde, A. (Eds.) An integrated view of language development - Papers in honor of Henning Wode. pp. 17-42. Trier: Wissenshaftliche Verlag. [Google Scholar]
Mazur Palandre, A., Fayol, M. & Jisa, H. 2012. Information Flow across Modalities and Text Types. In Past, present, and future contributions of cognitive writing research to cognitive psychology, Berninger, V. (éd), Psychology Press/Taylor Francis Group, 423-437. [Google Scholar]
Mazur-Palandre A. et Jisa, H. (2012). La complexité lexicale des syntagmes nominaux : Une étude développementale. Enfance, 4, 359-371. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Mazur-Palandre, A. & Jisa, H. 2012. Introduire et développer l’information : une acquisition tardive? Cognitique, 7 (cogitextes.revues.org/500) [Google Scholar]
Mazur-Palandre, A. 2007. Later language development: syntactic packaging in written and spoken French. Paper presented at The Second Oxford Linguistics Postgraduate Conference, Oxford. [Google Scholar]
Mazur-Palandre, A. 2008. Referential cohesion in written expository and narrative: A developmental study. Sigwriting 2008, The 11th international conference of the EARLI, social interest group on writing, Lund University. [Google Scholar]
Mazur-Palandre, A. 2009. Le flux de l’information, aspects syntaxiques et discursifs : Une étude fonctionnaliste et développementale. Thèse de doctorat, Université de Lyon. [Google Scholar]
Mazur-Palandre, A. et Jisa, H. 2012. La lexicalité des productions orales et écrites : Une étude développementale. Enfance. [Google Scholar]
McCutchen, D. 2011. From novice to expert: Implications of language skills and writing-relevant knowledge for memory during the development of writing skill. Journal of Writing Research, v. 3, 51-68. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Mosenthal, P. 1985. Defining the expository discourse continuum, toward a taxinomy of expository text. Poetics 14: 387-414. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Nippold, M. A. et Scott, C. M. 2009. Expository discourse in children, adolescents, and adults. London: Psychology Press. [Google Scholar]
Ravid, D. 2000. NP complexity in the development of text writing. Developing Literacy Across Genres, Modalities and Languages 3: 163-170. [Google Scholar]
Ravid, D. 2002. Paper about NP analysis: conceptualization and methodological issues. Tel Aviv University. [Google Scholar]
Ravid, D. 2005. Emergence of linguistic complexity in later language development: evidence from expository text construction. In Ravid, D., Shyldkrot, H.B. (Eds.), Perspectives on language and language development. Essays in Honor of Ruth A. Berman. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 337-355. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Ravid, D. 2006. Semantic development in textual contexts during the school years: Noun Scale analyses. Journal of Child Language 33: 791–821. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Ravid, D. et Berman, R. 2012. Developing noun phrase complexity across adolescence: A text-embedded analysis. First Language 30 (1): 1-29. [Google Scholar]
Reilly, J., Jisa, H., Baruch, E. & Berman, R. 2002. Propositional attitudes. Journal of Written Language and Literacy 5:2, 183-218. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Reinhart, T. 1980. Conditions for text coherence, Poetics Today 1: 161-180. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Sanford, A. et Garrod, S. 1981a. Understanding written language, New York: Wiley. [Google Scholar]
Sanford, A. et Garrod, S. 1981b. Vers la construction d‘un modèle psychologique de la compréhension du langage écrit. Bulletin de psychologie 35: 643-648. [Google Scholar]
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1987). Knowledge telling and knowledge transforming in written composition. Advances in applied psycholinguistics, 1, 142. [Google Scholar]
Schneuwly, B. 1988. Le langage écrit chez l’enfant, Neuchâtel: Delachaux et Niestlé. [Google Scholar]
Strömquivst, S., Johansson, V., Kriz, S., Ragnarsdöttir, H., Aisenman, R. et Ravid, D. 2002. Toward a crosslinguistic comparison of lexical quanta in speech and writing. Written Language and Literacy 5, 45-67 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Strömqvist, S., Holmqvist, K. Johansson, V., Karlsson, H. et Wengelin, A. 2006. What key stroke logging can reveal about writing. In Sullivan, K. et Lindgren, E. (éds.) Computer key-stroke logging and writing : methods and applications. Studies in writing, 18 : 45-72. [Google Scholar]
Strömqvist, S., Nordqvist, A. et Wengelin, A. 2004. Writing the frog story : developmental and cross-modal perspectives. In Ströpqvist, S. et Verhoeven, L. (éds) Relating events in narrative : typological and contextual perspectives. Mahwah, New Jersey : Erlbaum, 359-394. [Google Scholar]
Tomasello. Michael. 2012. The usage-based theory of language acquisition. In Bavin, E. éd., The Cambridge handbook of child language. Cambridge University Press. pp. 69-88 [Google Scholar]
Viguié-Simon, A. 2001. Développement de la connectivité selon le type textuel et le mode de production au cours de l’adolescence. Thèse de Doctorat, Université Lumière, Lyon. [Google Scholar]